ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2015
California Family Planning Health Care Providers' Challenges to Same-Day Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Provision.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) placement: a systematic review of the benefits and barriers in the United States.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Training contraceptive providers to offer intrauterine devices and implants in contraceptive care: a cluster randomized trial.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2018Trial
- Driving Time and Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Provision in North Carolina.North Carolina medical journal · 2025Article
- Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Evidence-based family planning services among publicly funded providers in Texas.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Improving access to highly effective emergency contraception: an assessment of barriers and facilitators to integrating the levonorgestrel IUD as emergency contraception using two applications of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Delaware Contraceptive Access Now and Contraceptive Initiation Among Medicaid Enrollees, 2015‒2020.American journal of public health · 2022Article
- Improving Capacity at School-based Health Centers to Offer Adolescents Counseling and Access to Comprehensive Contraceptive Services.Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology · 2021Article
- Implementation science: Scaling a training intervention to include IUDs and implants in contraceptive services in primary care.Preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2020Article
- Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning services among healthcare workers in Kashmir - A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019Article
- Low-Income Texas Women's Experiences Accessing Their Desired Contraceptive Method at the First Postpartum Visit.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2018Article
- Association of Access to Family Planning Services With Medicaid Expansion Among Female Enrollees in Michigan.JAMA network open · 2018Article
- Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence.Health services research · 2018Article
- Comparing long-acting reversible contraception insertion rates in women with Medicaid vs. private insurance in a clinic with a two-visit protocol.Contraception · 2018Article
- Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.Medical care · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the extent to which practices offering family planning services are able to offer intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants in one visit and to identify the reasons why multiple visits may be required.
methodsIn the fall of 2011, 1,000 California family planning providers were asked about their long-acting reversible contraception delivery practices in a probability survey. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine practice characteristics associated with same-day provision of IUDs and implants.
resultsAmong the 636 responding practices, 67% offered an IUD and 40% offered a contraceptive implant onsite. Among those with onsite provision, the majority required two or more visits to place an IUD (58%); almost half required two visits to place an implant (47%). Nearly all Planned Parenthood practices could place an IUD (95%) or implant (95%) at the initial visit, whereas the majority of all other practice types could not. The main reasons for delaying IUD and contraceptive implant provision included the need to screen and wait for test results (68% and 24%, respectively) and clinic flow and scheduling issues (50% and 64%, respectively). Multivariable analyses indicated that Planned Parenthood practices were significantly more likely than private practices to have same-day insertion protocols.
conclusionMost of the family planning providers surveyed have not adopted same-day long-acting reversible contraception insertion protocols and face barriers to same-day provision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26241424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.