Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2015
Diabetes Screening Reminder for Women With Prior Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01288144 (Clinical Decision Support for Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Decision Support for Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Health Record Nudges and Health Care Quality and Outcomes in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of medical systems · 2018Pooled it
- The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2020Trial
- Informatics Interventions for Maternal Morbidity: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Beyond one size fits all: Probing patient choices in gestational diabetes management, from screening to postpartum.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Digital health outreach to promote postpartum screening after gestational diabetes: A randomized factorial pilot study.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Gestational diabetes in Germany-prevalence, trend during the past decade and utilization of follow-up care: an observational study.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Digital Health Interventions to Enhance Prevention in Primary Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Controversies in Gestational Diabetes.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Article
- How do reminder systems in follow-up screening for women with previous gestational diabetes work? - a realist review.BMC health services research · 2021Review
- Article
- [Improved patient safety through a clinical decision support system in laboratory medicine].Der Internist · 2020Review
- Age-Dependent Hemoglobin A1c Therapeutic Targets Reduce Diabetic Medication Changes in the Elderly.EGEMS (Washington, DC) · 2019Article
- Barriers to Postpartum Follow-Up and Glucose Tolerance Testing in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.American journal of perinatology · 2018Article
- Optimizing postpartum care for the patient with gestational diabetes mellitus.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2017Article
- Diabetes Screening in US Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2012.Preventing chronic disease · 2016Article
- Health Systems Approaches to Diabetes Screening and Prevention in Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate whether an electronic health record (EHR) reminder improves rates of screening for type 2 diabetes in women with prior gestational diabetes.
methodsWe randomly allocated primary care providers (by clinic site) to a reminder for type 2 diabetes screening within the EHR or to usual care. Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus were identified through an automated search of laboratory results and the problem list. We compared rates of screening during the study period (2010-2012) in women at intervention sites with those at control sites. With a sample size of 850 participants, we had 80% power to detect a 15% difference in screening rates.
resultsWe included 847 individuals seen at a participating clinic during the study period, of whom 471 were at a reminder clinic and 376 were at a control clinic. A similar proportion of women were screened for type 2 diabetes in both groups (n=265, 56.3% of the reminder group compared with n=206, 54.8% of the control group, P=.67; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-1.38). Patient characteristics associated with risk for diabetes including body mass index (adjusted OR per kg/m 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and race (adjusted OR for nonwhite race 2.14, 95% CI 1.57-2.92) were significantly associated with screening.
conclusionA simple EHR reminder did not increase the rate of diabetes screening in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus. CLINICAL
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01288144. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.