The NIH-Industry New Therapeutic Uses Pilot Program: Demonstrating the Power of Crowdsourcing.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Therapies for rare diseases: therapeutic modalities, progress and challenges ahead.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2020
   Review
2. Bronchoprotection and bronchorelaxation in asthma: New targets, and new ways to target the old ones.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2016
   Review
3. Pioneering government-sponsored drug repositioning collaborations: progress and learning.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2015
   Review
4. The Rescue and Repurposing of Pharmaceuticals: Augmenting the Drug Development Paradigm.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as