Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26241019›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2015

Therapeutic use of human renal progenitor cells for kidney regeneration.

Benedetta Bussolati, Giovanni Camussi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Role of mitochondria in endogenous renal repair.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell and gene therapy for kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2023
    Review
  9. Chronic Kidney Disease: Challenges in Translational Medicine.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Kidney regeneration approaches for translation.World journal of urology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. PKHCells · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benedetta BussolatiDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
Giovanni CamussiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, Torino 10126, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of the human kidney to repair itself is limited. Consequently, repeated injury can trigger a maladaptive response that is characterized by fibrosis and loss of renal function. The transcription patterns that characterize nephrogenesis in fetal renal progenitor cells (RPCs) are only partially activated during renal repair in adults. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that segment-restricted progenitor resident cells support renal healing in adults. In this Review, we discuss the evidence for the existence of functional human RPCs in adults and their role in renal repair, and consider the controversial issue of whether RPCs are a fixed population or arise through phenotypical plasticity of tubular cells that is mediated by the microenvironment. We also discuss the strategies for generating renal progenitor cells from pluripotent stem cells or differentiated cells and their use in therapy. Finally, we examine preclinical data on the therapeutic use of human fetal cells, adult progenitor cells and adult renal cells.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem Cell TransplantationAnimalsHumansKidneyMiceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID26241019
OpenAlexW1856303224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.