ReviewClinical endoscopy2015
Colorectal Subepithelial Lesions.
Review in Clinical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bite-on-Bite Near Miss: From Hemangioma to Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.ACG case reports journal · 2026Article
- Upfront unroofing of subepithelial lesions using cold snare in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study from Switzerland.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Combined use of EUS, ESD, and laparoscopic techniques in the diagnosis and treatment of a mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon originating from the submucosal layer: a case report.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Aggressive fibromatosis of the sigmoid colon: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Penile Prosthetic Pump Reservoir Mimicking a Cecal Subepithelial Mass.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- Colonoscopy-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection for a large symptomatic colonic lipoma.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Clinicopathologic and Endosonographic Characteristics of Colon Subepithelial Tumors Discovered Incidentally.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- An Atypical Presentation of a Colonic Lipoma: Avoiding Surgery with a Deeper Endoscopic Look.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Cellular Angiofibroma Presenting as a Subepithelial Rectal Mass.ACG case reports journal · 2020Article
- Histopathologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and final pathology and the role of transrectal ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Current Status of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
- Highlights from the 52nd Seminar of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Clinical endoscopy · 2015Review
- EUS and EUS-guided FNA/core biopsies in the evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract: 10-year experience.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of subepithelial lesion (SEL) being identified was accidentally discovered as small bulging lesion covered with normal mucosa from endoscopic screening. The type of treatment and prognosis vary depending on the type of tumor, it would be crucial to perform an accurate differential diagnosis. Since the differentiation of SEL relied on the indirect findings observed from the mucosal surface using an endoscopy only in the past, it was able to confirm the presence of lesion only but difficult to identify complex detailed nature of the lesion. However, after the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was introduced, it became possible to identify extrinsic compression, and size of intramural tumors, internal properties and contour so that it gets possible to have differential diagnosis of lesions and prediction on the lesion whether it is malignant or benign. In addition, the use of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and EUS-guided core biopsy made it possible to make histological differential diagnosis. This study intended to investigate endoscopic and EUS findings, histological diagnosis, treatment regimen and impression of colorectal SELs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.