Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240633›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2015

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC): case report and review of the literature.

Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki, Krzysztof Szmyt, Adam Bobkiewicz, Stanisław Malinger, Józef Świrkowicz, Jacek Hermann, Michał Drews, Tomasz Banasiewicz

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Letter to the Editor: High Rates of Readmission in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Natural History or Opportunity for Improvement?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maciej Borejsza-WysockiDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Krzysztof SzmytDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Adam BobkiewiczDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Stanisław MalingerDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Józef ŚwirkowiczDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Jacek HermannDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Michał DrewsDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz BanasiewiczDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become a standard in the treatment of chronic and difficult healing wounds. Negative pressure wound therapy is applied to the wound via a special vacuum-sealed sponge. Nowadays, the endoscopic vacuum-assisted wound closure system (E-VAC) has been proven to be an important alternative in patients with upper and lower intestinal leakage not responding to standard endoscopic and/or surgical treatment procedures. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted wound closure system provides perfect wound drainage and closure of various kinds of defect and promotes tissue granulation. Our experience has shown that E-VAC may significantly improve the morbidity and mortality rate. Moreover, E-VAC may be useful in a multidisciplinary approach - from upper gastrointestinal to rectal surgery complications. On the other hand, major limitations of the E-VAC system are the necessity of repeated endoscopic interventions and constant presence of well-trained staff. Further, large-cohort studies need to be performed to establish the applicability and effectiveness of E-VAC before routine widespread use can be recommended.

Indexed as

endoscopic vacuum-assisted wound closure systemEndo-Spongeeosophageal leakagepancreatico-gastric anastomotic insufficiencyrectal anastomotic leakagevacuum-assisted wound closure therapy

Identifiers

PMID26240633
PMCPMC4520842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.