Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240481›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2015

The Effect of Asthma Clinical Guideline for Adults on Inhaled Corticosteroids PrescriptionTrend: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Sang Hyuck Kim, Be Long Cho, Dong Wook Shin, Seung-Sik Hwang, Hyejin Lee, Eun Mi Ahn, Jae Moon Yun, Yun Hee Chung, You Seon Nam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sang Hyuck KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Be Long ChoDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. ; Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, Korea. ; Institute on Aging, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Wook ShinDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seung-Sik HwangDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Hyejin LeeDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Mi AhnDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Moon YunDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yun Hee ChungDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
You Seon NamDepartment of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRInha University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to increase inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use and to reduce hospitalization, emergency department visits and ultimately the economic burden of asthma, "Korean Asthma Management Guideline for Adults 2007" was developed. To assess the guideline effects on physician's ICS prescription for asthma, we conducted segmented regression and multilevel logistic regression using National Health Insurance claims database of outpatient visits from 2003 to 2010. We set each quarter of a year as a time unit and compared ICS prescription between before and after guideline dissemination. A total of 624,309 quarterly visits for asthma was observed. The ICS prescription rate before and after guideline dissemination was 13.3% and 16.4% respectively (P < 0.001). In the segmented regression, there was no significant guideline effect on overall ICS prescription rate. In multilevel logistic regression analyses, the effect of guideline on overall ICS prescription was not significant (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06). In subgroup analysis, ICS prescription increased in secondary care hospitals (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.30) and in general hospitals (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16). However, in primary clinics, which covered 81.7% of asthma cases, there was no significant change (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.02). From the in-depth interview, we could identify that the reimbursement criteria of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service and patient's preference for oral drug were barriers for the ICS prescription. The domestic asthma clinical guideline have no significant effect on ICS prescription, especially in primary clinics.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdministration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAllergy and ImmunologyAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAsthmaDrug PrescriptionsGuideline AdherenceHumansPrevalencePulmonary MedicineRepublic of KoreaTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAsthmaCorticosteroidGuideline

Identifiers

PMID26240481
PMCPMC4520934
OpenAlexW2157925842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.