Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240459›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2015

Identifying implementation bottlenecks for maternal and newborn health interventions in rural districts of the United Republic of Tanzania.

Ulrika Baker, Stefan Peterson, Tanya Marchant, Godfrey Mbaruku, Silas Temu, Fatuma Manzi, Claudia Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Did a quality improvement intervention improve quality of maternal health care? Implementation evaluation from a cluster-randomized controlled study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulrika BakerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy Research, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden .
Stefan PetersonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, International Maternal and Child Health (IMCH), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden .
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England .
Godfrey MbarukuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania .
Silas TemuIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania .
Fatuma ManziIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania .
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Global Health-Health Systems and Policy Research, Karolinska Institutet, Widerströmska huset, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden .

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate effective coverage of maternal and newborn health interventions and to identify bottlenecks in their implementation in rural districts of the United Republic of Tanzania.

methodsCross-sectional data from households and health facilities in Tandahimba and Newala districts were used in the analysis. We adapted Tanahashi's model to estimate intervention coverage in conditional stages and to identify implementation bottlenecks in access, health facility readiness and clinical practice. The interventions studied were syphilis and pre-eclampsia screening, partograph use, active management of the third stage of labour and postpartum care.

findingsEffective coverage was low in both districts, ranging from only 3% for postpartum care in Tandahimba to 49% for active management of the third stage of labour in Newala. In Tandahimba, health facility readiness was the largest bottleneck for most interventions, whereas in Newala, it was access. Clinical practice was another large bottleneck for syphilis screening in both districts.

conclusionThe poor effective coverage of maternal and newborn health interventions in rural districts of the United Republic of Tanzania reinforces the need to prioritize health service quality. Access to high-quality local data by decision-makers would assist planning and prioritization. The approach of estimating effective coverage and identifying bottlenecks described here could facilitate progress towards universal health coverage for any area of care and in any context.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInfant HealthInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicLabor Stage, ThirdMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedPostnatal CarePregnancyRural Health Services

Identifiers

PMID26240459
PMCPMC4450702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.