Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240328›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Linking fecal bacteria in rivers to landscape, geochemical, and hydrologic factors and sources at the basin scale.

Marc P Verhougstraete, Sherry L Martin, Anthony D Kendall, David W Hyndman, Joan B Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marc P VerhougstraeteDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; mverhougstraete@email.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-7531
Sherry L MartinDepartment of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Anthony D KendallDepartment of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
David W HyndmanDepartment of Geological Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Joan B RoseDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking fecal indicator bacteria concentrations in large mixed-use watersheds back to diffuse human sources, such as septic systems, has met limited success. In this study, 64 rivers that drain 84% of Michigan's Lower Peninsula were sampled under baseflow conditions for Escherichia coli, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (a human source-tracking marker), landscape characteristics, and geochemical and hydrologic variables. E. coli and B. thetaiotaomicron were routinely detected in sampled rivers and an E. coli reference level was defined (1.4 log10 most probable number⋅100 mL(-1)). Using classification and regression tree analysis and demographic estimates of wastewater treatments per watershed, septic systems seem to be the primary driver of fecal bacteria levels. In particular, watersheds with more than 1,621 septic systems exhibited significantly higher concentrations of B. thetaiotaomicron. This information is vital for evaluating water quality and health implications, determining the impacts of septic systems on watersheds, and improving management decisions for locating, constructing, and maintaining on-site wastewater treatment systems.

Indexed as

Water MicrobiologyBacteroidesEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliFecesGeologyHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMichiganWastewaterWaterWater PollutantsWastewaterWaterWater PollutantsBacteroides thetaiotaomicronbaseflowEscherichia colireference conditionsseptic system

Identifiers

PMID26240328
PMCPMC4547304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.