Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240291›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Identification of a Three-Biomarker Panel in Urine for Early Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Tomasz P Radon, Nathalie J Massat, Richard Jones, Wasfi Alrawashdeh, Laurent Dumartin, Darren Ennis, Stephen W Duffy, Hemant M Kocher, Stephen P Pereira, Luisa Guarner posthumous and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04449406 (Early Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04449406 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Early Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Using a Panel of Biomarkers (UroPanc)

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan2020 to 2026Enrolled3,500ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategy for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Challenges of early detection of pancreatic cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Proteomics in pancreatic cancer.Biomarker research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomasz P RadonCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Nathalie J MassatCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard JonesMS Bioworks, LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Wasfi AlrawashdehCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Laurent DumartinCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Darren EnnisCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen W DuffyCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Hemant M KocherCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen P PereiraInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luisa Guarner posthumousHospital General Universitari Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristiane Murta-NascimentoHospital del Mar - Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco X RealCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Núria MalatsCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
John NeoptolemosThe NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Eithne CostelloThe NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
William GreenhalfThe NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Nick R LemoineCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Tatjana Crnogorac-JurcevicCentre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. t.c.jurcevic@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Bryan Quilty Spring · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
Cancer Research UK 12008Cancer Research UK 15957Cancer Research UK 16812Cancer Research UK 8968Cancer Research UK A12008Department of Health PB-PG-0407-13363NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNoninvasive biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are currently not available. Here, we aimed to identify a set of urine proteins able to distinguish patients with early-stage PDAC from healthy individuals. EXPERIMENTAL

designProteomes of 18 urine samples from healthy controls, chronic pancreatitis, and patients with PDAC (six/group) were assayed using GeLC/MS/MS analysis. The selected biomarkers were subsequently validated with ELISA assays using multiple logistic regression applied to a training dataset in a multicenter cohort comprising 488 urine samples.

resultsLYVE-1, REG1A, and TFF1 were selected as candidate biomarkers. When comparing PDAC (n = 192) with healthy (n = 87) urine specimens, the resulting areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of the panel were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-0.94] in the training (70% of the data) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98) in the validation (30% of the data) datasets. When comparing PDAC stage I-II (n = 71) with healthy urine specimens, the panel achieved AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00) in the training and validation datasets, respectively. In PDAC stage I-II and healthy samples with matching plasma CA19.9, the panel achieved a higher AUC of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) than CA19.9 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95, P = 0.005). Adding plasma CA19.9 to the panel increased the AUC from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00, P = 0.04), but did not improve the comparison of stage I-IIA PDAC (n = 17) with healthy urine.

conclusionsWe have established a novel, three-protein biomarker panel that is able to detect patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer in urine specimens.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLithostathineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsProteomeAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, Tumorcarbohydrate antigen 199, humanLithostathineLYVE1 protein, humanProteomeREG1A protein, humanTFF1 protein, humanTrefoil Factor-1Tumor Suppressor ProteinsVesicular Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26240291
PMCPMC4539580
OpenAlexW1929411275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.