Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240183›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology2015

Rapid pairing and resegregation of distant homologous loci enables double-strand break repair in bacteria.

Anjana Badrinarayanan, Tung B K Le, Michael T Laub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromosome topology gates productive RecA homology search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The RecA-directed recombination pathway of natural transformation initiates at chromosomal replication forks in the pneumococcus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SMC protein RecN drives RecA filament translocation for in vivo homology search.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ssDNA is an allosteric regulator of theGenes & development · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anjana BadrinarayananDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Tung B K LeDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Michael T LaubDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 laub@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Cell Cycle Regulation in Caulobacter CrescentusR01GM082899 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LAUB, MICHAEL · 2008 to 2020
$3.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082899NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM082899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) can lead to the loss of genetic information and cell death. Although DSB repair via homologous recombination has been well characterized, the spatial organization of this process inside cells remains poorly understood, and the mechanisms used for chromosome resegregation after repair are unclear. In this paper, we introduced site-specific DSBs in Caulobacter crescentus and then used time-lapse microscopy to visualize the ensuing chromosome dynamics. Damaged loci rapidly mobilized after a DSB, pairing with their homologous partner to enable repair, before being resegregated to their original cellular locations, independent of DNA replication. Origin-proximal regions were resegregated by the ParABS system with the ParA structure needed for resegregation assembling dynamically in response to the DSB-induced movement of an origin-associated ParB away from one cell pole. Origin-distal regions were resegregated in a ParABS-independent manner and instead likely rely on a physical, spring-like force to segregate repaired loci. Collectively, our results provide a mechanistic basis for the resegregation of chromosomes after a DSB.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsBase PairingCaulobacter crescentusChromosome SegregationDNA PrimaseDNA RepairDNA ReplicationHomologous RecombinationLuminescent ProteinsRec A RecombinasesSOS Response, GeneticsTime-Lapse ImagingAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsDNA PrimaseLuminescent ProteinsRec A Recombinasesyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID26240183
PMCPMC4523614
OpenAlexW2109523604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.