Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26240089›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2015

Diagnostic labelling influences self-rated health. A prospective cohort study: the HUNT Study, Norway.

Pål Jørgensen, Arnulf Langhammer, Steinar Krokstad, Siri Forsmo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Underdiagnosis of Health: A Key Driver of Overdiagnosis of Disease.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Brain Fog in Hypothyroidism: What Is It, How Is It Measured, and What Can Be Done About It.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Hypothyroidism.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  12. Primary hypothyroidism and quality of life.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  13. Optimal Thyroid Hormone Replacement.Endocrine reviews · 2022
    Article
  14. The Impact of Diagnostic Status on Quality of Life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of Psychosocial Variables on the Health of People Living in Housing Exclusion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Precision medicine in the clouds.Nature biotechnology · 2018
    Article
  19. How medical technologies shape the experience of illness.Life sciences, society and policy · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pål JørgensenDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7489 Trondheim and pal.jorgensen@ntnu.no.
Arnulf LanghammerDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Steinar KrokstadDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, HUNT Research Centre, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Siri ForsmoDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7489 Trondheim and.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have shown an independent association between poor self-rated health (SRH) and increased mortality. Few studies, however, have investigated any possible impact on SRH of diagnostic labelling.

objectiveTo test whether SRH differed in persons with known and unknown hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM) or hypertension, opposed to persons without these conditions, after 11-year follow-up.

methodsProspective population-based cohort study in North-Trøndelag County, Norway, HUNT2 (1995-97) to HUNT3 (2006-08). All inhabitants aged 20 years and older were invited. The response rate was 69.5% in HUNT2 and 54.1% in HUNT3. In total, 34144 persons aged 20-70 years were included in the study population. The outcome was poor SRH.

resultsPersons with known disease had an increased odds ratio (OR) to report poor SRH at follow-up; figures ranging from 1.11 (0.68-1.79) to 2.52 (1.46-4.34) (men with hypothyroidism kept out owing to too few numbers). However, in persons not reporting, but having laboratory results indicating these diseases (unknown disease), no corresponding associations with SRH were found. Contrary, the OR for poor SRH in women with unknown hypothyroidism and unknown hypertension was 0.64 (0.38-1.06) and 0.89 (0.79-1.01), respectively.

conclusionsAwareness opposed to ignorance of hypothyroidism, DM and hypertension seemed to be associated with poor perceived health, suggesting that diagnostic labelling could have a negative effect on SRH. This relationship needs to be tested more thoroughly in future research but should be kept in mind regarding the benefits of early diagnosing of diseases.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth StatusAdultAgedDiabetes MellitusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth SurveysHumansHypertensionHypothyroidismMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProspective StudiesCohortdiabetes mellitushypertensionhypothyroidismlongitudinalself-rated health.

Identifiers

PMID26240089
PMCPMC4576760
OpenAlexW2113852686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.