Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26239407›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2015

Breeding patterns and cultivated beets origins by genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium analyses.

Brigitte Mangin, Florian Sandron, Karine Henry, Brigitte Devaux, Glenda Willems, Pierre Devaux, Ellen Goudemand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insights into the genetic relationships among plants of Beta section Beta using SNP markers.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brigitte ManginINRA, Laboratoire des Interactions Plantes-Microorganismes (LIPM), UMR441, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Florian SandronINRA, Mathématique et Informatique Appliquées de Toulouse (MIAT), UR875, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Karine HenryS.A.S. Florimond-Desprez Veuve and Fils, BP41, 59242, Cappelle-en-Pévèle, France.
Brigitte DevauxS.A.S. Florimond-Desprez Veuve and Fils, BP41, 59242, Cappelle-en-Pévèle, France.
Glenda WillemsSESVanderHave, Industriepark Soldatenplein Zone 2/Nr 15, 3300, Tienen, Belgium.
Pierre DevauxS.A.S. Florimond-Desprez Veuve and Fils, BP41, 59242, Cappelle-en-Pévèle, France.
Ellen GoudemandS.A.S. Florimond-Desprez Veuve and Fils, BP41, 59242, Cappelle-en-Pévèle, France. ellen.goudemand@florimond-desprez.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageGenetic diversity in worldwide population of beets is strongly affected by the domestication history, and the comparison of linkage disequilibrium in worldwide and elite populations highlights strong selection pressure. Genetic relationships and linkage disequilibrium (LD) were evaluated in a set of 2035 worldwide beet accessions and in another of 1338 elite sugar beet lines, using 320 and 769 single nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively. The structures of the populations were analyzed using four different approaches. Within the worldwide population, three of the methods gave a very coherent picture of the population structure. Fodder beet and sugar beet accessions were grouped together, separated from garden beets and sea beets, reflecting well the origins of beet domestication. The structure of the elite panel, however, was less stable between clustering methods, which was probably because of the high level of genetic mixing in breeding programs. For the linkage disequilibrium analysis, the usual measure (r (2)) was used, and compared with others that correct for population structure and relatedness (r S (2) , r V (2) , r VS (2)). The LD as measured by r (2) persisted beyond 10 cM within the elite panel and fell below 0.1 after less than 2 cM in the worldwide population, for almost all chromosomes. With correction for relatedness, LD decreased under 0.1 by 1 cM for almost all chromosomes in both populations, except for chromosomes 3 and 9 within the elite panel. In these regions, the larger extent of LD could be explained by strong selection pressure.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageLinkage DisequilibriumPlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBeta vulgarisDNA FingerprintingDNA, PlantGenetics, PopulationGenotypeModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticDNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.