Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26239280›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2016

Expected 10-year treatment cost of breast cancer detected within and outside a public screening program in Norway.

Tron A Moger, Gudrun M W Bjørnelv, Eline Aas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02835625 (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - The Future Screening Tool for Breast Cancer?), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02835625 nacompletednot on this map

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis - The Future Screening Tool for Breast Cancer?

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian Institute of Public HealthRan2016 to 2021Enrolled29,453ConditionsBreast NeoplasmsArmsSynthetic Mammography + Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Digital mammography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tron A MogerDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, PO Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway. tronmo@medisin.uio.no.
Gudrun M W BjørnelvDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, PO Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
Eline AasDepartment of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, PO Box 1089, 0317, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe shift towards earlier stages of disease advancement at diagnosis when introducing mammography screening is expected to affect the treatment costs of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe collected data on hospital resource use in Norway following a breast cancer diagnosis for the period 1 January, 2008 through 31 December, 2009 for women aged 50-69 years, diagnosed with breast cancer during the period 1 January, 1999 through 31 December, 2009. We estimated treatment costs using a function that included the probability of being at risk for receiving treatment, estimated by means of the Cox proportional hazard model.

resultsIn total, 16,045 patients were included for the analyses among which 10.5 % died during the study period. The mean 10-year per-person treatment cost was €31,940 (95 % CI €31,030-32,880), and lower for cancers detected within the public screening program (€30,730) than for those detected elsewhere (€36,230). For ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and cancers in stages I thru IV, treatment costs were €15,740, €23,570, €46,550, €55,230 and €60,430, respectively. Interval cancers occurring within the screening program were generally more resource demanding than both cancers detected at screening or elsewhere.

conclusionsTen-year treatment costs increased by increasing stage at diagnosis. Patients whose cancer was detected within the public screening program had lower treatment costs than those detected elsewhere. Interval cancers had higher costs than others.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNorwayProportional Hazards ModelsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast cancerLong-term costsScreeningTreatment costs

Identifiers

PMID26239280
OpenAlexW1846009810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.