Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26239007›Full record

SynthesisThe Canadian journal of cardiology2015

Resilience in Vulnerable Populations With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

M Amalia Pesantes, María Lazo-Porras, Abd Moain Abu Dabrh, Jaime R Ávila-Ramírez, María Caycho, Georgina Y Villamonte, Grecia P Sánchez-Pérez, Germán Málaga, Antonio Bernabé-Ortiz, J Jaime Miranda

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M Amalia PesantesCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
María Lazo-PorrasCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Abd Moain Abu DabrhKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jaime R Ávila-RamírezKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
María CaychoKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Georgina Y VillamonteKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Grecia P Sánchez-PérezKnowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Germán MálagaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Antonio Bernabé-OrtizCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
J Jaime MirandaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. Electronic address: jaime.miranda@upch.pe.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PE

Funding

Latin America Treatment & Innovation Network in Mental Health (LATIN-MH)U19MH098780 · NIMH · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI ARAYA, RICARDO, MENEZES, PAULO ROSSI · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Launching a salt substitute to reduce blood pressure at the population level-PeruU01HL114180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GILMAN, ROBERT H · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Implementation of foot thermometry and SMS to prevent diabetic foot ulcerR21TW009982 · FIC · UNIVERSIDAD PERUANA CAYETANO HEREDIA · PI MIRANDA, J JAIME · 2014 to 2015
$329k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW009982FIC NIH HHS R21TW009982Medical Research Council M007405Medical Research Council MR/M007405/1NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268200900033CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN 268200900033C-1-0-1NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL114180NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL114180NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH098780NIMH NIH HHS U19MH098780Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103994/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic conditions and limited access to health care experience stressful challenges resulting from the burden of managing both their conditions and their daily life demands. Resilience provides a mechanism of adapting to stressful experiences. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the evidence about interventions to enhance resiliency in managing hypertension or type 2 diabetes in vulnerable populations and to assess the efficacy of these interventions on clinical outcomes.

methodsWe searched multiple databases from early inception through February 2015 including randomized controlled trials that enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension. All interventions that targeted resilience in vulnerable populations were included. Data were synthesized to describe the characteristics and efficacy of resiliency interventions. We pooled the total effects by calculating standardized mean difference using the random-effects model.

resultsThe final search yielded 17 studies. All studies were conducted in the United States and generally targeted minority participants. Resiliency interventions used diverse strategies; discussion groups or workshops were the most common approach.

conclusionsInterventions aimed at enhancing the resiliency of patients from vulnerable groups are diverse. Outcomes were not fully conclusive. There was some evidence that resiliency interventions had a positive effect on hemoglobin A1C levels but not blood pressure. The incorporation of resiliency-oriented interventions into the arsenal of preventing and managing chronic conditions appears to be an opportunity that remains to be better investigated and exploited, and there is need to pursue further understanding of the core components of any intervention that claims to enhance resilience.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalCultural CompetencyDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypertensionSelf CareVulnerable PopulationsGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID26239007
PMCPMC4556590
OpenAlexW2130505728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.