Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26238999›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Agreement between self-reported perinatal outcomes and administrative data in New South Wales, Australia.

Ellie Gresham, Peta Forder, Catherine L Chojenta, Julie E Byles, Deborah J Loxton, Alexis J Hure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Large-Scale Data Harmonization Across Prospective Studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, obesity, and hypertension in later life by age group: a cross-sectional analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  12. Macrosomia and psychiatric risk in adolescence.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellie GreshamResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. ellie.gresham@uon.edu.au.
Peta ForderResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. peta.forder@newcastle.edu.au.
Catherine L ChojentaResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. catherine.chojenta@newcastle.edu.au.
Julie E BylesResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. julie.byles@newcastle.edu.au.
Deborah J LoxtonResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. deborah.loxton@newcastle.edu.au.
Alexis J HureResearch Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, and Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia. alexis.hure@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany epidemiological studies that focus on pregnancy rely on maternal self-report of perinatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported perinatal outcomes (gestational hypertension with or without proteinuria, gestational diabetes, premature birth and low birth weight) in a longitudinal study and linked to administrative data (medical records).

methodsSelf-reported survey data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health was linked with the New South Wales Perinatal Data Collection. Agreement between the two sources was evaluated using percentage agreement and kappa statistics. Analyses were conducted at two levels by: i) the mother and ii) each individual child.

resultsWomen reliably self-report their perinatal outcomes (≥ 87 % agreement). Gestational hypertension with or without proteinuria had the lowest level of agreement. Mothers' reports of perinatal outcomes were more reliable when evaluated by child. Restricting the analysis to complete and consistent reporting further strengthened the reliability of the child-specific data, increasing the agreement from >92 to >95 % for all outcomes.

conclusionsThe present study offers a high degree of confidence in the use of maternal self-reports of the perinatal outcomes gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm birth and low birth weight in epidemiological research, particularly when reported on a per child basis. Furthermore self-report offers a cost-effective and convenient method for gathering detailed maternal perinatal histories.

Indexed as

RegistriesAdultData CollectionDiabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesNew South WalesPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID26238999
PMCPMC4524430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.