Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26238865›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Chlorhexidine decontamination of sputum for culturing Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Shady Asmar, Michel Drancourt

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Improved detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  13. Molecular detection ofNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  14. Whole Genome Sequence Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shady AsmarAix Marseille Université, URMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire «Méditerranée Infection», AP-HM, 13005, Marseille, France. asmar.shady@gmail.com.
Michel DrancourtAix Marseille Université, URMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire «Méditerranée Infection», AP-HM, 13005, Marseille, France. michel.drancourt@univ-amu.fr.
Méditerranée Infection Foundation · FRUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCulture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the gold standard method for the laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, after effective decontamination.

resultsWe evaluated squalamine and chlorhexidine to decontaminate sputum specimens for the culture of mycobacteria. Eight sputum specimens were artificially infected with 10(5) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans as contaminants. In the second step, we tested chlorhexidine-based decontamination on 191 clinical specimens, (Chlorhexidine, 0.1, 0.5 and 0.7 %). In a last step, growth of contaminants and mycobacteria was measured in 75 consecutive sputum specimens using the routine NALC-NaOH decontamination protocol or with 0.7 % chlorhexidine decontamination and an inoculation on Coletsos medium. In the artificially model, contaminants grew in 100 % of the artificially infected sputum specimens decontaminated using 100 mg/mL squalamine, in 62.5 % of specimens decontaminated using N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine-Sodium Hydroxide (NALC-NaOH), and in 0 % of specimens decontaminated using 0.1 %, 0.35 %, or 1 % chlorhexidine (P < 0.05). These specimens yielded <10(2) cfu M. tuberculosis using NALC-NaOH and > 1.4.10(2) cfu M. tuberculosis when any concentration of chlorhexidine was used (P < 0.05). In the second step we found that 0.7 %-chlorhexidine yielded 0 % contamination rate, 3.2 % for 0.5 %-chlorhexidine and 28.3 % for 0.1 %-chlorhexidine. As for the 75 specimens treated in parallel by both methods we found that when using the standard NALC-NaOH decontamination method, 8/75 (10.7 %) specimens yielded M. tuberculosis colonies with a time to detection of 17.5 ± 3 days and an 8 % contamination rate. Additionally, 14 specimens yielded mycobacteria colonies (12 M. tuberculosis, and 2 Mycobacterium bolletii) (18.7 %) (P = 0.25), which has yielded a 100 % sensitivity for the chlorhexidine protocol. Time to detection was of 15.86 ± 4.7 days (P = 0.39) and a 0 % contamination rate (P < 0.05) using the 0.7 %-chlorhexidine protocol.

conclusionIn our work we showed for the first time that chlorhexidine based decontamination is superior to the standard NALC-NaOH method in the isolation of M. tuberculosis from sputum specimens. We currently use 0.7 %-chlorhexidine for the routine decontamination of sputum specimens for the isolation of M. tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis mycobacteria on egg-lecithin containing media.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBacteriological TechniquesChlorhexidineCholestanolsDecontaminationHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisSpecimen HandlingSputumTuberculosisAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineCholestanolssqualamine

Identifiers

PMID26238865
PMCPMC4524104
OpenAlexW1807488933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.