Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26238602›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Dietary Quality of Americans by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Status: A Systematic Review.

Tatiana Andreyeva, Amanda S Tripp, Marlene B Schwartz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05939349 (A Prescription for Health Equity), which is not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
34.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05939349 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prescription for Health Equity: A Healthcare Provider-based Produce Prescription Program for People With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorGriffin HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled134ConditionsPre Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsProduce Prescription Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatiana AndreyevaRudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut. Electronic address: tatiana.andreyeva@uconn.edu.
Amanda S TrippYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Marlene B SchwartzRudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut.
University of Connecticut · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Training Program in Addiction, Economics and PolicyT32DA031104 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SINDELAR, JODY L. · 2011 to 2015
$908k
NIDA NIH HHS 5T32DA031104NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA031104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is an effective component in reducing food insecurity in the U.S. In the discussion of strategies to also help SNAP participants maximize diet quality, it is important to know their current dietary patterns and food choices. This paper provides a systematic review of recent U.S. studies on dietary quality, food consumption, and spending among SNAP participants as compared to income-eligible and higher-income nonparticipants. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The review, completed in 2014, summarized studies that were peer-reviewed, published between January 2003 and August 2014, and provided data on dietary quality and intake of SNAP participants and nonparticipants. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five studies were included in this review. Daily caloric, macronutrient, and micronutrient intake of SNAP participants did not differ systematically from those of income-eligible nonparticipants; however, differences in dietary quality emerged. Adult SNAP participants scored lower on the Healthy Eating Index than either group of nonparticipants. Children's diets were similar among SNAP participants and low-income nonparticipants, but were less nutritious than diets of higher-income children. The evidence regarding sugar-sweetened beverage consumption was mixed, with most studies indicating significantly higher beverage intake among SNAP participants compared with higher-income nonparticipants, but no difference compared to income-eligible nonparticipants.

conclusionsSNAP effectively alleviates food insecurity in terms of caloric, macronutrient, and micronutrient intake. Still, SNAP participants are struggling more than income-eligible and higher-income nonparticipants to meet key dietary guidelines. Future policies should ensure that this vital food assistance program addresses diet quality while reducing food insecurity.

Indexed as

DietFood AssistanceHumansNutritional StatusNutritive Value

Identifiers

PMID26238602
PMCPMC6022372
OpenAlexW1048079032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.