Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26238338›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Developing clinical decision tools to implement chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: the BETTER 2 program (building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care).

Donna Patricia Manca, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Kami Kandola, Carolina Aguilar, Julia Baxter, Christopher Meaney, Ginetta Salvalaggio, June C Carroll, Vee Faria and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Donna Patricia MancaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada. dpmanca@ualberta.ca.
Denise Campbell-SchererDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada. dlcampbe@ualberta.ca.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerDiscipline of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Phillip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada. kaubrey@mun.ca.
Kami KandolaDepartment of Health and Social Services, Government of Northwest Territories, P.O. Box 1320, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, X1A 2L9, Canada. kami_kandola@gov.nt.ca.
Carolina AguilarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada. carolina.aguilar@ualberta.ca.
Julia BaxterDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada. better.project@utoronto.ca.
Christopher MeaneyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada. christopher.meaney@utoronto.ca.
Ginetta SalvalaggioDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada. ginetta@ualberta.ca.
June C CarrollDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada. jcarroll@mtsinai.on.ca.
Vee FariaDepartment of Health and Social Services, Government of Northwest Territories, P.O. Box 1320, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, X1A 2L9, Canada. vfaria@auroracollege.nt.ca.
Candace NykiforukSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada. candace.nykiforuk@ualberta.ca.
Eva GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada. eva.grunfeld@utoronto.ca.
original BETTER Trial Investigators and Clinical Working Group
University of Toronto · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAGovernment of Northwest Territories · CAGrey Nuns Community Hospital · CAMemorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Family Practice (BETTER) trial demonstrated the effectiveness of an approach to chronic disease prevention and screening (CDPS) through a new skilled role of a 'prevention practitioner'(PP). The PP has appointments with patients 40-65 years of age that focus on primary prevention activities and screening of cancer (breast, colorectal, cervical), diabetes and cardiovascular disease and associated lifestyle factors. There are numerous and occasionally conflicting evidence-based guidelines for CDPS, and the majority of these guidelines are focused on specific diseases or conditions; however, primary care providers often attend to patients with multiple conditions. To ensure that high-level evidence guidelines were used, existing clinical practice guidelines and tools were reviewed and integrated into blended BETTER tool kits. Building on the results of the BETTER trial, the BETTER tools were updated for implementation of the BETTER 2 program into participating urban, rural and remote communities across Canada.

methodsA clinical working group consisting of PPs, clinicians and researchers with support from the Centre for Effective Practice reviewed the literature to update, revise and adapt the integrated evidence algorithms and tool kits used in the BETTER trial. These resources are nuanced, based on individual patient risk, values and preferences and are designed to facilitate decision-making between providers across the target diseases and lifestyle factors included in the BETTER 2 program. Using the updated BETTER 2 toolkit, clinicians 1) determine which CDPS actions patients are eligible to receive and 2) develop individualized 'prevention prescriptions' with patients through shared decision-making and motivational interviewing.

resultsThe tools identify the patients' risks and eligible primary CDPS activities: the patient survey captures the patient's health history; the prevention visit form and integrated CDPS care map identify eligible CDPS activities and facilitate decisions when certain conditions are met; and the 'bubble diagram' and 'prevention prescription' promote shared decision-making.

conclusionThe integrated clinical decision-making tools of BETTER 2 provide resources for clinicians and policymakers that address patients' complex care needs beyond single disease approaches and can be adapted to facilitate CDPS in the urban, rural and remote clinical setting.

trial registrationThe registration number of the original RCT BETTER trial was ISRCTN07170460 .

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesQuality ImprovementChronic DiseaseHumansMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPreventive MedicinePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26238338
PMCPMC4523915
OpenAlexW1501022857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.