Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26238261›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2015

Profiling unauthorized natural resource users for better targeting of conservation interventions.

Mariel Harrison, Julia Baker, Medard Twinamatsiko, E J Milner-Gulland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Conservation publications and their provisions to protect research participants.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating models of human behaviour between the individual and population levels to inform conservation interventions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mariel HarrisonDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY.
Julia BakerParsons Brinckerhoff, 6 Devonshire Square, London, EC2M 4YE.
Medard TwinamatsikoInstitute of Tropical Forest Conservation, P.O. Box 44, Kabale, Uganda.
E J Milner-GullandDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unauthorized use of natural resources is a key threat to many protected areas. Approaches to reducing this threat include law enforcement and integrated conservation and development (ICD) projects, but for such ICDs to be targeted effectively, it is important to understand who is illegally using which natural resources and why. The nature of unauthorized behavior makes it difficult to ascertain this information through direct questioning. Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, has many ICD projects, including authorizing some local people to use certain nontimber forest resources from the park. However, despite over 25 years of ICD, unauthorized resource use continues. We used household surveys, indirect questioning (unmatched count technique), and focus group discussions to generate profiles of authorized and unauthorized resource users and to explore motivations for unauthorized activity. Overall, unauthorized resource use was most common among people from poor households who lived closest to the park boundary and farthest from roads and trading centers. Other motivations for unauthorized resource use included crop raiding by wild animals, inequity of revenue sharing, and lack of employment, factors that created resentment among the poorest communities. In some communities, benefits obtained from ICD were reported to be the greatest deterrents against unauthorized activity, although law enforcement ranked highest overall. Despite the sensitive nature of exploring unauthorized resource use, management-relevant insights into the profiles and motivations of unauthorized resource users can be gained from a combination of survey techniques, as adopted here. To reduce unauthorized activity at Bwindi, we suggest ICD benefit the poorest people living in remote areas and near the park boundary by providing affordable alternative sources of forest products and addressing crop raiding. To prevent resentment from driving further unauthorized activity, ICDs should be managed transparently and equitably.

Indexed as

ForestsNatural ResourcesConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansMotivationParks, RecreationalSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUgandacaza furtivagorilas de montañamountain gorillasnatural resource usepoachingpobrezapovertyresentimientoresentmenttécnica de conteo no pareadoUgandaunmatched count techniqueuso de recursos protegidas

Identifiers

PMID26238261
PMCPMC4975694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.