Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26237652›Full record

ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics2016

Limited acquisition and generalisation of rhotics with ultrasound visual feedback in childhood apraxia.

Jonathan L Preston, Edwin Maas, Jessica Whittle, Megan C Leece, Patricia McCabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Motor-based treatment with and without ultrasound feedback for residual speech-sound errors.International journal of language & communication disorders · 2017
    Trial
  7. Tongue Part Movement Trajectories for /r/ Using Ultrasound.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan L Prestona Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders , Syracuse University , Syracuse , NY , USA.
Edwin Maasc Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences , University of Arizona , Tucson , AZ , USA.
Jessica Whittleb Haskins Laboratories , New Haven , CT , USA.
Megan C Leecea Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders , Syracuse University , Syracuse , NY , USA.
Patricia McCabed Department of Speech Pathology , University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia.
Haskins Laboratories · USSyracuse University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

Reduction in spread of excitation as predictor multi-channel spectral resolutionR01DC012152 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LANDSBERGER, DAVID M · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Ultrasound Biofeedback for Therapy-Resistant Speech Sound Disorders in ChildrenR03DC013152 · NIDCD · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI PRESTON, JONATHAN · 2013 to 2015
$497k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012152NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC012152NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue is one treatment option for individuals with persisting speech sound errors. This study evaluated children's performance during acquisition and generalisation of American English rhotics using ultrasound feedback. Three children aged 10-13 with persisting speech sound errors associated with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) were treated for 14 one-hour sessions. Two of the participants increased the accuracy of their rhotic production during practise trials within treatment sessions, but none demonstrated generalisation to untreated words. Lack of generalisation may be due to a failure to acquire the target with sufficient accuracy during treatment, or to co-existing linguistic weaknesses that are not addressed in a motor-based treatment. Results suggest a need to refine the intervention procedures for CAS and/or a need to identify appropriate candidates for intervention to optimise learning.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologySpeechUltrasonographyAdolescentApraxiasChildCuesHumansLanguageMaleSpeech AcousticsSpeech Production MeasurementTongueChildhood apraxia of speechfeedbackrhoticsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID26237652
PMCPMC4740254
OpenAlexW1835328165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.