Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26237317›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015

Sex differences in monoamines following amphetamine and social reward in adolescent rats.

Virginia G Weiss, Rebecca S Hofford, Justin R Yates, Faith C Jennings, Michael T Bardo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect of a social peer on risky decision making in male Sprague Dawley rats.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  7. Rewarding Effect ofPsychology research and behavior management · 2020
    Article
  8. An insular view of the social decision-making network.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019
    Review
  9. Sex-dependent regulation of social reward by oxytocin receptors in the ventral tegmental area.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex-dependent regulation of social reward by oxytocin: an inverted U hypothesis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia G WeissDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Rebecca S HoffordDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
Justin R YatesDepartment of Psychological Science, Northern Kentucky University.
Faith C JenningsCollege of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky.
Michael T BardoDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky.
University of Kentucky · USNorthern Kentucky University · US

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LYNAM, DONALD R · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
Research Training in Drug Abuse BehaviorT32DA035200 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CRAIG R RUSH, William Walton Stoops · 2013 to 2026
$4.4M
Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
NOVELTY, DOPAMINE AND RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINER01DA012964 · NIDA · YAUPON THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 2000 to 2013
$3.7M
Social isolation: effects on the stress axis and stimulant self-administrationF32DA036291 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HOFFORD, REBECCA · 2014 to 2014
$40k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA036291NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA05312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012964NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA035200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interaction with social peers may increase rates of drug self-administration, but a recent study from our laboratory showed that social interaction may serve as a type of alternative reward that competes with drug taking in adolescent male rats. Based on those previous results, the current study examined sex differences in preference for social interaction compared with amphetamine (AMPH) in adolescent rats using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. Similar to previous results with males, females showed AMPH CPP regardless of whether they were individual- or pair-housed. In contrast to males, however, females failed to show social CPP, and they did not prefer a peer-associated compartment over an AMPH-associated compartment in a free-choice test. In separate experiments, dopamine (DA) and serotonin (5-HT) metabolite levels were measured in adolescent males and females that were exposed acutely to peer interaction, no peer interaction, AMPH, or saline. In amygdala, levels of the DA metabolite dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were altered more in response to peer interaction in males than females; in contrast, there was a greater amygdala DOPAC response to AMPH in females. Furthermore, there were greater changes in the 5-HT metabolite hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in females than in males following social interaction. These results indicate that the ability of peer interactions to reduce drug reward is greater in adolescent males than females, perhaps due to a greater ability of social cues to activate limbic reward mechanisms in males or a greater ability of AMPH cues to activate limbic reward mechanisms in females.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsRewardSex CharacteristicsAmphetamineAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBiogenic MonoaminesBrainCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, PsychologicalFemaleMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAmphetamineBiogenic MonoaminesCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID26237317
PMCPMC4523899
OpenAlexW1617923121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.