Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26237183›Full record

ArticleJournal of abnormal psychology2015

Visual context processing dysfunctions in youth at high risk for psychosis: Resistance to the Ebbinghaus illusion and its symptom and social and role functioning correlates.

Vijay A Mittal, Tina Gupta, Brian P Keane, Steven M Silverstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abnormal psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of visual dysfunctions in recent-onset psychosis and clinical high-risk state for psychosis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  9. Saccadic suppression in schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computerized Assessment of Psychosis Risk.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University.
Tina GuptaDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University.
Brian P KeaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers University.
Steven M SilversteinDepartment of Psychiatry, Rutgers University.

Funding

Frontal-Subcortical Development, Movement Abnormalities, and Risk for PsychosisR01MH094650 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Perceptual Organization Dysfunction as a Biomarker of SchizophreniaR01MH093439 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI SILVERSTEIN, STEVEN M · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR33MH103231 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2016 to 2018
$689k
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR21MH103231 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2014 to 2015
$489k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093439NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094650NIMH NIH HHS R01MH094650NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH103231NIMH NIH HHS R21/R33MH103231NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH103231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired visual context processing is closely linked with expression of symptoms in people with psychosis. However, to date, there have been no investigations of this phenomenon in the critical ultra high-risk (UHR) period immediately preceding the onset of psychosis. In total, 73 participants (33 UHR, 40 control) were evaluated with clinical and global functioning interviews and with a computerized task that required comparing the size of 2 target circles. Targets could appear by themselves (no-context condition), or within a context that made size judgment easier (helpful condition) or more difficult (misleading condition). Susceptibility to illusion was measured as the accuracy differences between the no-context and the helpful (i.e., helpful-index) and the misleading (i.e., misleading-index) conditions. Both groups exhibited approximately the same percentage of accurate responses to the no-context condition. However, the UHR subjects exhibited significantly less susceptibility to the illusion, performing superior to controls on the misleading index. The UHR group also showed less susceptibility on the helpful index, but this was not significant. Lower susceptibility on the misleading index was associated with increased negative symptoms and role functioning at a trend level. Lower susceptibility on the helpful index was significantly associated with increased negative symptoms and both poor role and social functioning. These results indicate that visual context processing is impaired during the UHR period, and is related to core illness features, suggesting that this task may be a useful biomarker in studies of UHR participants.

Indexed as

Social AdjustmentSocial BehaviorAdolescentFemaleHumansIllusionsMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26237183
PMCPMC4658222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.