Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26237110›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Selections that isolate recombinant mitochondrial genomes in animals.

Hansong Ma, Patrick H O'Farrell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome copy number predicts extreme evolutionary rate variation in plant mitochondrial DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mitochondrial Dysfunctions and Potential Molecular Markers in Sport Horses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insights Into the Role of Mitochondria in Vascular Calcification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Mitochondrial function in development and disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2021
    Review
  18. Safeguarding mitochondrial genomes in higher eukaryotes.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Mapping and editing animal mitochondrial genomes: can we overcome the challenges?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Manipulating and elucidating mitochondrial gene expression with engineered proteins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hansong MaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Patrick H O'FarrellDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-2734
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The genetic basis for tissue specific sensitivities to mitochondrial stressR01ES020725 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Host management of the mitochondrial genomeR01GM120005 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
Nitric Oxide Signaling in Hypoxia and Immunity in DrosophilaR01GM086854 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI O'FARRELL, PATRICK H · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020725NIGMS NIH HHS GM086854NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086854NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination is widespread and catalyzes evolution. Nonetheless, its existence in animal mitochondrial DNA is questioned. We designed selections for recombination between co-resident mitochondrial genomes in various heteroplasmic Drosophila lines. In four experimental settings, recombinant genomes became the sole or dominant genome in the progeny. Thus, selection uncovers occurrence of homologous recombination in Drosophila mtDNA and documents its functional benefit. Double-strand breaks enhanced recombination in the germline and revealed somatic recombination. When the recombination partner was a diverged Drosophila melanogaster genome or a genome from a different species such as Drosophila yakuba, sequencing revealed long continuous stretches of exchange. In addition, the distribution of sequence polymorphisms in recombinants allowed us to map a selected trait to a particular region in the Drosophila mitochondrial genome. Thus, recombination can be harnessed to dissect function and evolution of mitochondrial genome.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialHomologous RecombinationAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialDrosophila melanogasterSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Mitochondrialcell biologyD. melanogasterevolutionary biologygenomicshomologous recombinationmitochondrial DNAselection for recombinant genomes

Identifiers

PMID26237110
PMCPMC4584245
OpenAlexW1926293196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.