Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236818›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2014

Endovascular Treatment of Spinal Vascular Lesion in Japan: Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) and JR-NET2.

Wataro Tsuruta, Yuji Matsumaru, Shigeru Miyachi, Nobuyuki Sakai

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wataro Tsuruta
Yuji Matsumaru
Shigeru Miyachi
Nobuyuki Sakai

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subgroup analysis of spinal vascular lesions in the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) and JR-NET2, retrospective registry studies conducted in 2005–2009, was performed to understand the current status of treatment in Japan. Of 201 spinal lesions enrolled, 98 analyzable cases of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF), 43 of spinal perimedullary arteriovenous fistula (SPAVF), and 23 of spinal intramedullary arteriovenous malformation (SIAVM) were assessed. Treatment was radical in the majority (83.6%) of SDAVF, palliative in the majority (70.6%) of SIAVM, and radical and palliative in a similar number of cases of SPAVF. Total occlusion was achieved in 26 (54.2%) SDAVF cases, 9 (29.0%) SPAVF, and 4 (23.5%) SIAVM. Treatment-related complications occurred in 3 (3.1%) SDAVF cases, 7 (16.3%) SPAVF, and 1 (4.3%) SIAVM. Post-treatment neurological improvement was achieved in 49 (50.0%) of SDAVF cases, 15 (34.9%) SPAVF, and 5 (21.7%) SIAVM. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0, 1, or 2 on postoperative day 30, the primary endpoint, was achieved in 62 (63.3%) SDAVF cases, 26 (60.5%) SPAVF, and 12 (52.2%) SIAVM. The mRS of 0–2 on postoperative day 30 was correlated with presymptomatic mRS of 0–2 [P<0.0001, odds ratio (OR): 42.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.83–123.97] and postoperative neurological improvement (P=0.046, OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.02–6.48). In Japan, endovascular treatment of spinal vascular lesions was administered safely. Good mRS on postoperative day 30 was highly correlated with good pre-symptomatic mRS, suggesting necessity of early diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresNeuroendoscopyRegistriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCentral Nervous System Vascular MalformationsFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord Vascular DiseasesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26236818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.