Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236706›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2015

Understanding DNA under oxidative stress and sensitization: the role of molecular modeling.

Elise Dumont, Antonio Monari

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The conformation of the complementary strand and the deformation of the DNA groove upon DDB2 binding justifies the different repair rates for cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genotoxic effects of PMEnvironmental geochemistry and health · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elise DumontLaboratoire de Chimie, UMR 5182 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Lyon, France.
Antonio MonariUniversité de Lorraine - Nancy, Theory-Modeling-Simulation, Structure et Réactivité des Systèmes Moléculaires Complexes (SRSMC) Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France ; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Theory-Modeling-Simulation, Structure et Réactivité des Systèmes Moléculaires Complexes (SRSMC) Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Institut de Recherche sur les Systèmes Atomiques et Moléculaires Complexes · FRLaboratoire de Chimie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA is constantly exposed to damaging threats coming from oxidative stress, i.e., from the presence of free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Sensitization from exogenous and endogenous compounds that strongly enhance the frequency of light-induced lesions also plays an important role. The experimental determination of DNA lesions, though a difficult subject, is somehow well established and allows to elucidate even extremely rare DNA lesions. In parallel, molecular modeling has become fundamental to clearly understand the fine mechanisms related to DNA defects induction. Indeed, it offers an unprecedented possibility to get access to an atomistic or even electronic resolution. Ab initio molecular dynamics may also describe the time-evolution of the molecular system and its reactivity. Yet the modeling of DNA (photo-)reactions does necessitate elaborate multi-scale methodologies to tackle a damage induction reactivity that takes place in a complex environment. The double-stranded DNA environment is first characterized by a very high flexibility, but also a strongly inhomogeneous electrostatic embedding. Additionally, one aims at capturing more subtle effects, such as the sequence selectivity which is of critical important for DNA damage. The structure and dynamics of the DNA/sensitizers complexes, as well as the photo-induced electron- and energy-transfer phenomena taking place upon sensitization, should be carefully modeled. Finally the factors inducing different repair ratios for different lesions should also be rationalized. In this review we will critically analyze the different computational strategies used to model DNA lesions. A clear picture of the complex interplay between reactivity and structural factors will be sketched. The use of proper multi-scale modeling leads to the in-depth comprehension of DNA lesions mechanisms and also to the rational design of new chemo-therapeutic agents.

Indexed as

DNAenergy/electron transfermolecular modelingphotochemistryphotodynamic therapyphotosensitization

Identifiers

PMID26236706
PMCPMC4500984
OpenAlexW1506392485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.