Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236632›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2015

A standardised faecal collection protocol for intestinal helminth egg counts in Asian elephants, Elephas maximus.

Carly L Lynsdale, Diogo J Franco Dos Santos, Adam D Hayward, Khyne U Mar, Win Htut, Htoo Htoo Aung, Aung Thura Soe, Virpi Lummaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Morphological and molecular identification of cyathostomine gastrointestinal nematodes ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Altered parasite community structure in an endangered marsupial following translocation.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Gastrointestinal parasites of Asian elephants (Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carly L LynsdaleDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Diogo J Franco Dos SantosDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, Avenida da Universidade Técnica, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal.
Adam D HaywardInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Ashworth Laboratories, Charlotte Auerbach Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.
Khyne U MarDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.
Win HtutMyanma Timber Enterprise, Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry, Gyogone Forest Compound, Bayint Naung Road, Insein Township, Yangon, Myanmar.
Htoo Htoo AungMyanma Timber Enterprise, Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry, Gyogone Forest Compound, Bayint Naung Road, Insein Township, Yangon, Myanmar.
Aung Thura SoeMyanma Timber Enterprise, Ministry of Environmental Conservation and Forestry, Gyogone Forest Compound, Bayint Naung Road, Insein Township, Yangon, Myanmar.
Virpi LummaaDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantitative assessment of parasite infection is necessary to measure, manage and reduce infection risk in both wild and captive animal populations. Traditional faecal flotation methods which aim to quantify parasite burden, such as the McMaster egg counting technique, are widely used in veterinary medicine, agricultural management and wildlife parasitology. Although many modifications to the McMaster method exist, few account for systematic variation in parasite egg output which may lead to inaccurate estimations of infection intensity through faecal egg counts (FEC). To adapt the McMaster method for use in sampling Asian elephants (Elephas maximus), we tested a number of possible sources of error regarding faecal sampling, focussing on helminth eggs and using a population of over 120 semi-captive elephants distributed across northern Myanmar. These included time of day of defecation, effects of storage in 10% formalin and 10% formol saline and variation in egg distribution between and within faecal boluses. We found no significant difference in the distribution of helminth eggs within faecal matter or for different defecation times, however, storage in formol saline and formalin significantly decreased egg recovery. This is the first study to analyse several collection and storage aspects of a widely-used traditional parasitology method for helminth parasites of E. maximus using known host individuals. We suggest that for the modified McMaster technique, a minimum of one fresh sample per elephant collected from any freshly produced bolus in the total faecal matter and at any point within a 7.5 h time period (7.30am-2.55 pm) will consistently represent parasite load. This study defines a protocol which may be used to test pre-analytic factors and effectively determine infection load in species which produce large quantities of vegetative faeces, such as non-ruminant megaherbivores.

Indexed as

Faecal egg countParasiteSampling method

Identifiers

PMID26236632
PMCPMC4501537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.