Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236469›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2015

Advanced and Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Lupus.

Nicolae Sarbu, Núria Bargalló, Ricard Cervera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neuropsychiatric Lupus: The Devil is in the Detail.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolae SarbuSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain.
Núria BargallóSection of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain.
Ricard CerveraDepartment of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08036, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric lupus is a major diagnostic challenge, and a main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is, by far, the main tool for assessing the brain in this disease. Conventional and advanced MRI techniques are used to help establishing the diagnosis, to rule out alternative diagnoses, and recently, to monitor the evolution of the disease. This review explores the neuroimaging findings in SLE, including the recent advances in new MRI methods.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingMRIneuropsychiatric lupusNPSLESLEsystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID26236469
PMCPMC4505788
OpenAlexW2212515494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.