Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236351›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale

Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization: Celebrating 50 years.

Shalini Desai, Shainoor J Lsmail, Robert Lerch, Bryna F Warshawsky, Ian Gemmill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Networking-A quintessential public health activity.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Article
  2. What is new in the Canadian Immunization Guide: November 2016 to November 2018.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shalini DesaiPublic Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, Ontario;
Shainoor J LsmailPublic Health Agency of Canada, Edmonton, Alberta;
Robert LerchPublic Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa;
Bryna F WarshawskyPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario.
Ian GemmillPublic Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, Ontario;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have saved more lives than any other innovation in modern medicine. National immunization committees play a vital role in the development of evidence-based recommendations for the use of vaccines. The present article describes the evolution and work of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization in Canada as the group marks its 50th anniversary. The article also provides insight into the future challenges that the committee is likely to face.

Indexed as

Advisory committeeCanadaDecision makingImmunization programs

Identifiers

PMID26236351
PMCPMC4507835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.