Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236285›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Mechanistic lessons learned from studies of planktonic bacteria with metallic nanomaterials: implications for interactions between nanomaterials and biofilm bacteria.

Navid B Saleh, Bryant Chambers, Nirupam Aich, Jaime Plazas-Tuttle, Hanh N Phung-Ngoc, Mary Jo Kirisits

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emerging Trends in Nanomaterials for Antibacterial Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Navid B SalehDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Bryant ChambersDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Nirupam AichDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Jaime Plazas-TuttleDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Hanh N Phung-NgocDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.
Mary Jo KirisitsDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal and metal-oxide nanoparticles (NPs) are used in numerous applications and have high likelihood of entering engineered and natural environmental systems. Careful assessment of the interaction of these NPs with bacteria, particularly biofilm bacteria, is necessary. This perspective discusses mechanisms of NP interaction with bacteria and identifies challenges in understanding NP-biofilm interaction, considering fundamental material attributes and inherent complexities of biofilm structure. The current literature is reviewed, both for planktonic bacteria and biofilms; future challenges and complexities are identified, both in light of the literature and a dataset on the toxicity of silver NPs toward planktonic and biofilm bacteria. This perspective aims to highlight the complexities in such studies and emphasizes the need for systematic evaluation of NP-biofilm interaction.

Indexed as

dissolved ionEPSmetal-oxide nanoparticlesphysical disruptionreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID26236285
PMCPMC4505144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.