ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2015
Frog intestinal perfusion to evaluate drug permeability: application to p-gp and cyp3a4 substrates.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics of CYP2C19- and CYP3A4-Metabolized Drugs in Cirrhosis Using a Whole-Body PBPK Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- The Absorption Characteristics of Nonvolatile Components in a Water Extraction FromFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- LC478, a Novel Di-Substituted Adamantyl Derivative, Enhances the Oral Bioavailability of Docetaxel in Rats.Pharmaceutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the reliability of using in situ frog intestinal perfusion technique for permeability assessment of carrier transported drugs which are also substrates for CYP enzymes. Single Pass Intestinal Perfusion (SPIP) studies were performed in frogs of the species Rana tigrina using established method for rats with some modifications after inducing anesthesia. Effective permeability coefficient (P eff) of losartan and midazolam was calculated in the presence and absence of inhibitors using the parallel-tube model. Peff of losartan when perfused alone was found to be 0.427 ± 0.27 × 10(-4)cm/s and when it was co-perfused with inhibitors, significant change in P eff was observed. Peff of midazolam when perfused alone was found to be 2.03 ± 0.07 × 10(-4)cm/s and when it was co-perfused with inhibitors, no significant change in P eff was observed. Comparison of P eff calculated in frog with that of other available models and also humans suggested that the P eff-values are comparable and reflected well with human intestinal permeability. It is possible to determine the P eff-value for compounds which are dual substrates of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 using in situ frog intestinal perfusion technique. The calculated P eff-values correlated well with reported P eff-values of probe drugs. comparison of the P eff-value of losartan obtained with that of reported human's P eff and Caco 2 cell data, and comparison of the P eff-value of midazolam with that of reported rat's P eff, we could conclude that SPIP from model can be reliably used in preclinical studies for permeability estimation. This model may represent a valuable alternative to the low speed and high cost of conventional animal models (typically rodents) for the assessment of intestinal permeability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.