Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236198›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2015

An in vitro method to manipulate the direction and functional strength between neural populations.

Liangbin Pan, Sankaraleengam Alagapan, Eric Franca, Stathis S Leondopulos, Thomas B DeMarse, Gregory J Brewer, Bruce C Wheeler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Engineering anFrontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Flexibility ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Coupling ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liangbin PanJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sankaraleengam AlagapanJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eric FrancaJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Stathis S LeondopulosJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Thomas B DeMarseJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gregory J BrewerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine Irvine, CA, USA.
Bruce C WheelerJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

ENGINEERING FORM AND FUNCTION IN NEURONAL NETWORKSR01NS052233 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI WHEELER, BRUCE C. · 2006 to 2016
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS052233NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the design and application of a Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMs) device that permits investigators to create arbitrary network topologies. With this device investigators can manipulate the degree of functional connectivity among distinct neural populations by systematically altering their geometric connectivity in vitro. Each polydimethylsilxane (PDMS) device was cast from molds and consisted of two wells each containing a small neural population of dissociated rat cortical neurons. Wells were separated by a series of parallel micrometer scale tunnels that permitted passage of axonal processes but not somata; with the device placed over an 8 × 8 microelectrode array, action potentials from somata in wells and axons in microtunnels can be recorded and stimulated. In our earlier report we showed that a one week delay in plating of neurons from one well to the other led to a filling and blocking of the microtunnels by axons from the older well resulting in strong directionality (older to younger) of both axon action potentials in tunnels and longer duration and more slowly propagating bursts of action potentials between wells. Here we show that changing the number of tunnels, and hence the number of axons, connecting the two wells leads to changes in connectivity and propagation of bursting activity. More specifically, the greater the number of tunnels the stronger the connectivity, the greater the probability of bursting propagating between wells, and shorter peak-to-peak delays between bursts and time to first spike measured in the opposing well. We estimate that a minimum of 100 axons are needed to reliably initiate a burst in the opposing well. This device provides a tool for researchers interested in understanding network dynamics who will profit from having the ability to design both the degree and directionality connectivity among multiple small neural populations.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCells, CulturedCerebral CortexEmbryo, MammalianFluoresceinsMicroelectrodesNerve NetNeuronsRatscalcein AMFluoresceinscortical synchronizationdissociated neuronal culturefunctional connectivityin vitroMEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical Systems)multielectrode arraystructure-activity relationship

Identifiers

PMID26236198
PMCPMC4500931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.