Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236171›Full record

ArticleNeoReviews

Epidemiology and Clinical Research Design, Part 2: Principles.

Veena Manja, Satyan Lakshminrusimha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeoReviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Veena ManjaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMasters University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Satyan LakshminrusimhaDepartment of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.

Funding

Optimal Oxygenation in Neonatal Lung InjuryR01HD072929 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Satyanarayana Lakshminrusimha · 2012 to 2026
$5.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the third article covering core knowledge in scholarly activities for neonatal physicians. In this article, we discuss various principles of epidemiology and clinical research design. A basic knowledge of these principles is necessary for conducting clinical research and for proper interpretation of studies. This article reviews bias and confounding, causation, incidence and prevalence, decision analysis, cost-effectiveness, sensitivity analysis, and measurement.

Identifiers

PMID26236171
PMCPMC4517623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.