Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236145›Full record

ArticleBehavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs2015

REDUCING AMBIGUITY IN THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR.

Griffin W Rooker, Iser G DeLeon, Carrie S W Borrero, Michelle A Frank-Crawford, Eileen M Roscoe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral interventions : theory & practice in residential & community-based clinical programs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Functional Analysis Decision-Making Considerations.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine Learning for Supplementing Behavioral Assessment.Perspectives on behavior science · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Griffin W RookerThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA ; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Iser G DeLeonUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Carrie S W BorreroThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA ; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Michelle A Frank-CrawfordThe Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA ; University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Eileen M RoscoeThe New England Center for Children, Southborough, MA 01772, USA ; Western New England University, Springfield, MA 01119, USA.
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USWestern New England University · US

Funding

Treatment Generalization and Contingency CoherenceP01HD055456 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MCILVANE, WILLIAM J · 2009 to 2013
$4.6M
Behavioral Economics in MRDD and Behavior DisordersR01HD049753 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI DELEON, ISER · 2006 to 2013
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD055456NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe problem behavior (e.g., self-injury and aggression) remains among the most serious challenges for the habilitation of persons with intellectual disabilities and is a significant obstacle to community integration. The current standard of behavior analytic treatment for problem behavior in this population consists of a functional assessment and treatment model. Within that model, the first step is to assess the behavior-environment relations that give rise to and maintain problem behavior, a functional behavioral assessment. Conventional methods of assessing behavioral function include indirect, descriptive, and experimental assessments of problem behavior. Clinical investigators have produced a rich literature demonstrating the relative effectiveness for each method, but in clinical practice, each can produce ambiguous or difficult-to-interpret outcomes that may impede treatment development. This paper outlines potential sources of variability in assessment outcomes and then reviews the evidence on strategies for avoiding ambiguous outcomes and/or clarifying initially ambiguous results. The end result for each assessment method is a set of best practice guidelines, given the available evidence, for conducting the initial assessment.

Identifiers

PMID26236145
PMCPMC4521420
OpenAlexW2162037018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.