Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26236108›Full record

ArticleSocial development (Oxford, England)2015

Prosocial Behavior: Long-Term Trajectories and Psychosocial Outcomes.

Elinor Flynn, Samuel E Ehrenreich, Kurt J Beron, Marion K Underwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social development (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. It's not just what you have, but when: The role and timing of developmental assets in the mental health of young adults.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elinor FlynnThe University of Texas at Dallas.
Samuel E EhrenreichThe University of Texas at Dallas.
Kurt J BeronThe University of Texas at Dallas.
Marion K UnderwoodThe University of Texas at Dallas.
The University of Texas at Dallas · US

Funding

Social Aggression: Growth, Outcomes, and Digital CommunicationR01HD060995 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI UNDERWOOD, MARION K. · 2009 to 2019
$4.3M
Social Aggression: Precursors and OutcomesR01MH063076 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI UNDERWOOD, MARION K. · 2002 to 2006
$1.8M
Social Aggression: Origins, Development, and OutcomesK02MH073616 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI UNDERWOOD, MARION K. · 2006 to 2010
$597k
Social Aggression: Growth and OutcomesR56MH063076 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI UNDERWOOD, MARION K. · 2008 to 2008
$495k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060995NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH073616NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063076NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH063076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated developmental trajectories for prosocial behavior for a sample followed from age 10 - 18 and examined possible adjustment outcomes associated with membership in different trajectory groups. Participants were 136 boys and 148 girls, their teachers, and their parents (19.4% African American, 2.4% Asian, 51.9% Caucasian, 19.5% Hispanic, and 5.8% other). Teachers rated children's prosocial behavior yearly in grades 4 - 12. At the end of the 12

Identifiers

PMID26236108
PMCPMC4517683
OpenAlexW1485983151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.