ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2015
Risk Classification with an Adaptive Naive Bayes Kernel Machine Model.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- RKMR: A Rapid Kernel Machine Regression Framework for Optimal Marker Detection in Spatial Omics Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CBKMR: A Copula-based Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression Framework for Optimal Marker Detection in Omics Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning for predicting distant metastases in renal cell carcinoma patients: a population-based retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.Genome biology · 2024Article
- PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- Leveraging functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for human complex diseases.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Combining Multiple Hypothesis Testing with Machine Learning Increases the Statistical Power of Genome-wide Association Studies.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- An Object-Oriented Regression for Building Disease Predictive Models with Multiallelic HLA Genes.Genetic epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic studies of complex traits have uncovered only a small number of risk markers explaining a small fraction of heritability and adding little improvement to disease risk prediction. Standard single marker methods may lack power in selecting informative markers or estimating effects. Most existing methods also typically do not account for non-linearity. Identifying markers with weak signals and estimating their joint effects among many non-informative markers remains challenging. One potential approach is to group markers based on biological knowledge such as gene structure. If markers in a group tend to have similar effects, proper usage of the group structure could improve power and efficiency in estimation. We propose a two-stage method relating markers to disease risk by taking advantage of known gene-set structures. Imposing a naive bayes kernel machine (KM) model, we estimate gene-set specific risk models that relate each gene-set to the outcome in stage I. The KM framework efficiently models potentially non-linear effects of predictors without requiring explicit specification of functional forms. In stage II, we aggregate information across gene-sets via a regularization procedure. Estimation and computational efficiency is further improved with kernel principle component analysis. Asymptotic results for model estimation and gene set selection are derived and numerical studies suggest that the proposed procedure could outperform existing procedures for constructing genetic risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.