Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26235965›Full record

ArticleProteins2015

Fast gap-free enumeration of conformations and sequences for protein design.

Kyle E Roberts, Pablo Gainza, Mark A Hallen, Bruce R Donald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Minimization-Aware RecursiveJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. cOSPREY: A Cloud-Based Distributed Algorithm for Large-Scale Computational Protein Design.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2016
    Article
  10. Algorithms for protein design.Current opinion in structural biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle E Roberts *Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Pablo Gainza *Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Mark A HallenDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Bruce R DonaldDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC.

Funding

Computational Structure-Based Protein DesignR01GM078031 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONALD, BRUCE R. · 2008 to 2021
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant successes in structure-based computational protein design in recent years, protein design algorithms must be improved to increase the biological accuracy of new designs. Protein design algorithms search through an exponential number of protein conformations, protein ensembles, and amino acid sequences in an attempt to find globally optimal structures with a desired biological function. To improve the biological accuracy of protein designs, it is necessary to increase both the amount of protein flexibility allowed during the search and the overall size of the design, while guaranteeing that the lowest-energy structures and sequences are found. DEE/A*-based algorithms are the most prevalent provable algorithms in the field of protein design and can provably enumerate a gap-free list of low-energy protein conformations, which is necessary for ensemble-based algorithms that predict protein binding. We present two classes of algorithmic improvements to the A* algorithm that greatly increase the efficiency of A*. First, we analyze the effect of ordering the expansion of mutable residue positions within the A* tree and present a dynamic residue ordering that reduces the number of A* nodes that must be visited during the search. Second, we propose new methods to improve the conformational bounds used to estimate the energies of partial conformations during the A* search. The residue ordering techniques and improved bounds can be combined for additional increases in A* efficiency. Our enhancements enable all A*-based methods to more fully search protein conformation space, which will ultimately improve the accuracy of complex biomedically relevant designs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareA* searchcombinatorial searchcomputational protein designstructure-based design

Identifiers

PMID26235965
PMCPMC4727861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.