Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26235604›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2015

Similar Outcomes of Standard Radiotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Hai-Ling Hou, Yong-Chun Song, Rui-Ying Li, Li Zhu, Lu-Jun Zhao, Zhi-Yong Yuan, Jin-Qiang You, Zhong-Jie Chen, Ping Wang

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hai-Ling HouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Yong-Chun SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Rui-Ying LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Li ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Lu-Jun ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Zhi-Yong YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Jin-Qiang YouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Zhong-Jie ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Ping WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant radiation therapy is commonly administered to breast cancer patients who received breast-conserving surgery. However, lengthy treatment times of standard radiotherapy pose certain challenges. Here, we performed a prospective controlled study comparing standard radiation to hypofractionated radiotherapy in terms of efficacy and outcome. MATERIAL AND

methodsEighty breast cancer patients (tumor stage pT1-2N0-1M0) who had undergone breast-conservation surgery were randomly divided into 2 groups (40 patients/group). The experimental group received 43.2 Gy to the whole breast in 18 fractions for 24 days with a concomitant boost (50.4 Gy) to the tumor bed. The control group received 45 Gy to the whole breast in 25 fractions for 44 days with a boost to the tumor bed of 59 Gy. Survival, locoregional recurrence, adverse effects, and aesthetic results were all considered for analysis.

resultsThe following criteria were included as part of study follow-up: local control, survival, adverse skin reactions, cosmetic outcome, and hematological toxicity. At a median follow-up of 27 months (follow-up rate 100%), there were no statistical differences in any of the categories between the 2 groups. The 2-year survival rate of both groups was 100% without any locoregional recurrence. Although there was some skin toxicity, these instances were not severe and they cleared on their own within 6 weeks. The most common problems encountered by patients were breast fibrosis and altered pigmentation.

conclusionsA shortened whole-breast hypofractionated irradiation schedule with a concomitant boost is as effective as standard radiation and may be a reasonable alternative following breast conservation surgery.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationMastectomy, SegmentalBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26235604
PMCPMC4529138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.