Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26234960›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2016

Relational learning and transitive expression in aging and amnesia.

Jennifer D Ryan, Maria C D'Angelo, Daphne Kamino, Melanie Ostreicher, Sandra N Moses, R Shayna Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. How do we generalize?Neurons, behavior, data analysis, and theory · 2021
    Article
  4. Generalization and the hippocampus: More than one story?Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2020
    Review
  5. The effect of repetition on pronoun resolution in patients with memory impairment.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2020
    Article
  6. Brain Mechanisms of Concept Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  7. Scenes facilitate associative memory and integration.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer D RyanRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maria C D'AngeloRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daphne KaminoRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Melanie OstreicherRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sandra N MosesRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
R Shayna RosenbaumRotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging has been associated with a decline in relational memory, which is critically supported by the hippocampus. By adapting the transitivity paradigm (Bunsey and Eichenbaum (1996) Nature 379:255-257), which traditionally has been used in nonhuman animal research, this work examined the extent to which aging is accompanied by deficits in relational learning and flexible expression of relational information. Older adults' performance was additionally contrasted with that of amnesic case DA to understand the critical contributions of the medial temporal lobe, and specifically, the hippocampus, which endures structural and functional changes in healthy aging. Participants were required to select the correct choice item (B versus Y) based on the presented sample item (e.g., A). Pairwise relations must be learned (A->B, B->C, C->D) so that ultimately, the correct relations can be inferred when presented with a novel probe item (A->C?Z?). Participants completed four conditions of transitivity that varied in terms of the degree to which the stimuli and the relations among them were known pre-experimentally. Younger adults, older adults, and DA performed similarly when the condition employed all pre-experimentally known, semantic, relations. Older adults and DA were less accurate than younger adults when all to-be-learned relations were arbitrary. However, accuracy improved for older adults when they could use pre-experimentally known pairwise relations to express understanding of arbitrary relations as indexed through inference judgments. DA could not learn arbitrary relations nor use existing knowledge to support novel inferences. These results suggest that while aging has often been associated with an emerging decline in hippocampal function, prior knowledge can be used to support novel inferences. However, in case DA, significant damage to the hippocampus likely impaired his ability to learn novel relations, while additional damage to ventromedial prefrontal and anterior temporal regions may have resulted in an inability to use prior knowledge to flexibly express indirect relational knowledge.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAmnesiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHippocampusHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationYoung Adultagingamnesiahippocampusmemorysemantic knowledgetransitivity

Identifiers

PMID26234960
PMCPMC5014178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.