Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26234955›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

Peer Network Counseling with Urban Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Moderate Substance Users.

Michael Mason, John Light, Leah Campbell, Lori Keyser-Marcus, Stephanie Crewe, Thomas Way, Heather Saunders, Laura King, Nikola M Zaharakis, Chantal McHenry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brief Drug Interventions Delivered in General Medical Settings: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Cannabis Use Outcomes.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Multilevel effects of alcohol among early adolescents in an urban school district.International journal of alcohol and drug research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Adolescent resilience to addiction: a social plasticity hypothesis.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2018
    Review
  20. A longitudinal study predicting adolescent tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis use by behavioral characteristics of close friends.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael MasonVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: Mjmason@vcu.edu.
John LightOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA.
Leah CampbellVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Lori Keyser-MarcusVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Stephanie CreweVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Thomas WayVillanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
Heather SaundersVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Laura KingVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Nikola M ZaharakisVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Chantal McHenryVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USOregon Research Institute · USVillanova University · US

Funding

Motivational Interviewing Integrated with Social Network Counseling for TeensR34DA032808 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MASON, MICHAEL JON · 2012 to 2014
$628k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R34DA032808NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA032808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close peer networks can affect adolescents' health behaviors by altering their social environments, and thus their risk for and protection against substance use involvement. We tested a 20 minute intervention named Peer Network Counseling that integrates motivational interviewing and peer network strategies with 119 urban adolescents who reported occasional or problem substance use. Adolescents presenting at primary care clinic were randomized to intervention or control conditions and followed for 6 months. Mixed-effect latent growth models were used to evaluate intervention effects on trajectories of alcohol and marijuana use, offers to use substances, and moderation models to test for interactions between intervention condition and peer network characteristics. A significant intervention effect was found for boys for offers to use alcohol from friends (p<.05), along with a trend significant effect for alcohol use (p<.08). Intervention was more effective in reducing marijuana use, vs. control, for participants with more peer social support (p<.001) and with more peer encouragement for prosocial behavior (school, clubs, sports, religious activities); however, intervention did not affect these network characteristics. Results provide support to continue this line of research to test brief interventions that activate protective peer network characteristics among at-risk adolescents, while also raising some interesting gender-based intervention questions for future research.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial EnvironmentSocial SupportUrban PopulationAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingCounselingFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeBrief interventionMotivational interviewingPeer Network CounselingPrimary careUrban adolescents

Identifiers

PMID26234955
PMCPMC4706361
OpenAlexW1811656171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.