Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26234823›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2015

The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.

Heejin Kwon, Jinhan Cho, Jongyeong Oh, Dongwon Kim, Junghyun Cho, Sanghyun Kim, Sangyun Lee, Jihyun Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heejin KwonDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jinhan ChoDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jongyeong OhDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Dongwon KimDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Junghyun ChoDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Sanghyun KimDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Sangyun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jihyun LeeDepartment of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether reduced radiation dose abdominal CT images reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) compromise the depiction of clinically competent features when compared with the currently used routine radiation dose CT images reconstructed with ASIR.

methods27 consecutive patients (mean body mass index: 23.55 kg m(-2) underwent CT of the abdomen at two time points. At the first time point, abdominal CT was scanned at 21.45 noise index levels of automatic current modulation at 120 kV. Images were reconstructed with 40% ASIR, the routine protocol of Dong-A University Hospital. At the second time point, follow-up scans were performed at 30 noise index levels. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), 40% ASIR, 30% ASIR-V, 50% ASIR-V and 70% ASIR-V for the reduced radiation dose. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses of image quality were conducted. The CT dose index was also recorded.

resultsAt the follow-up study, the mean dose reduction relative to the currently used common radiation dose was 35.37% (range: 19-49%). The overall subjective image quality and diagnostic acceptability of the 50% ASIR-V scores at the reduced radiation dose were nearly identical to those recorded when using the initial routine-dose CT with 40% ASIR. Subjective ratings of the qualitative analysis revealed that of all reduced radiation dose CT series reconstructed, 30% ASIR-V and 50% ASIR-V were associated with higher image quality with lower noise and artefacts as well as good sharpness when compared with 40% ASIR and FBP. However, the sharpness score at 70% ASIR-V was considered to be worse than that at 40% ASIR. Objective image noise for 50% ASIR-V was 34.24% and 46.34% which was lower than 40% ASIR and FBP.

conclusionAbdominal CT images reconstructed with ASIR-V facilitate radiation dose reductions of to 35% when compared with the ASIR. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study represents the first clinical research experiment to use ASIR-V, the newest version of iterative reconstruction. Use of the ASIR-V algorithm decreased image noise and increased image quality when compared with the ASIR and FBP methods. These results suggest that high-quality low-dose CT may represent a new clinical option.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, AbdominalReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26234823
PMCPMC4730981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.