ArticleScientific reports2015
Label-free single-cell protein quantification using a drop-based mix-and-read system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-molecule fluorescence methods for protein biomarker analysis.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Microfluidic and Paper-Based Devices for Disease Detection and Diagnostic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Particle-Templated Emulsification for Microfluidics-Free Digital Biology.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Taking Systems Medicine to Heart.Circulation research · 2018Review
- Ultrasensitive Quantification of Cytokine Proteins in Single Lymphocytes From Human Blood FollowingFrontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Integrating Immunology and Microfluidics for Single Immune Cell Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Biophysical isolation and identification of circulating tumor cells.Lab on a chip · 2017Article
- Development of Droplet Microfluidics Enabling High-Throughput Single-Cell Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Review
- A mix-and-read drop-based in vitro two-hybrid method for screening high-affinity peptide binders.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative protein analysis of single cells is rarely achieved due to technical difficulties of detecting minute amounts of proteins present in one cell. We develop a mix-and-read assay for drop-based label-free protein analysis of single cells. This high-throughput method quantifies absolute, rather than relative, amounts of proteins and does not involve antibody labeling or mass spectrometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.