Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26234391›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire.

Goran Cuturilo, Olivera Kontic Vucinic, Ivana Novakovic, Svetlana Ignjatovic, Marija Mijovic, Nenad Sulovic, Dusan Vukolic, Milica Komnenic, Jasmina Tadic, Aleksandar Cetkovic and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Goran CuturiloFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. udkgenetika@udk.bg.ac.rs.
Olivera Kontic VucinicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ivana NovakovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Svetlana IgnjatovicInstitute for Medical Biochemistry, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marija MijovicDepartment of Medical Genetics, University Children's Hospital, Tirsova 10, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nenad SulovicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Dusan VukolicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milica KomnenicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jasmina TadicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar CetkovicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra BelicClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandar LjubicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSUniversity Children's Hospital, Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the first study in Serbia and the region of South-East Europe dedicated to clients' perception of outcome and efficiency of prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling. The primary aim of this study was to assess overall value and success of genetic counseling in prenatal and reproductive care with regard to perceived personal control of clients, reflecting also in a part patient comprehension, knowledge retention, and empowerment in decision-making. The standardized Perceived Personal Control questionnaire (PPC) was used for the assessment of 239 female participants. First, we performed a complete validation of the psychometric characteristics of the Serbian-language version of the PPC questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaire permits other researchers from Serbian-speaking regions of South-East Europe to use this standard instrument to assess the effectiveness of prenatal genetic counseling in their communities and analyze advantages and disadvantages of their counseling models. We also measured social and demographic characteristics of participants. Further, we analyzed effects of our team-based prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling model through (a) calculation of PPC scores at three different stages (before initial, after initial, and before second counseling session), and (b) by assessing participants' responses by indication for referral (advanced maternal age, abnormal biochemical screening, family history of hereditary disorders, maternal exposure to drugs, exposure to radiation, exposure to infective agents, infertility or recurrent abortions, and miscellaneous). The results indicate that participants' knowledge after initial counseling increased significantly and after that remained stable and sustainable. A satisfactory level of confidence among participants had been achieved, in that many felt an increased sense of control over their situation and emotional response to it. Indirectly, these results indicate the success of a team-based prenatal genetic counseling model, which has not been assessed in the literature to date.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePersonal SatisfactionSelf ConceptAdultDecision MakingFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrenatal DiagnosisReproductionSerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultOutcomePerceived Personal Control (PPC)Prenatal genetic counselingQuestionnaireSatisfactionSerbiaSouth-East EuropeValidation

Identifiers

PMID26234391
OpenAlexW1092332569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.