Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26234174›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2015

Vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (VALOR): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.

Farhad Ravandi, Ellen K Ritchie, Hamid Sayar, Jeffrey E Lancet, Michael D Craig, Norbert Vey, Stephen A Strickland, Gary J Schiller, Elias Jabbour, Harry P Erba and 26 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01191801 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Multinational Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vosaroxin and Cytarabine Versus Placebo and Cytarabine in Patients With First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01191801 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Multinational Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Vosaroxin and Cytarabine Versus Placebo and Cytarabine in Patients With First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (VALOR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunesis PharmaceuticalsRan2010 to 2017Enrolled711ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsvosaroxin + cytarabine, placebo + cytarabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Farhad RavandiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: fravandi@mdanderson.org.
Ellen K RitchieWeill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hamid SayarIndiana University Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jeffrey E LancetMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Michael D CraigWest Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Norbert VeyInstitut Paoli-Calmettes and Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Stephen A StricklandVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Gary J SchillerUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Elias JabbourUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Harry P ErbaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Arnaud PigneuxUniversité de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Heinz-August HorstMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christian RecherInstitut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Université de Toulouse III, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Virginia M KlimekMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jorge CortesUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Olatoyosi OdenikeUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Xavier ThomasHôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Violaine HavelangeCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan MaertensUniversitair Ziekenhuis, Leuven, Belgium.
Hans-Günter DerigsKlinikum Frankfurt Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Michael HeuserHannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lloyd DamonUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bayard L PowellWake Forest University Baptist Medical Center-Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Gianluca GaidanoDepartment of Translational Medicine, Amedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Angelo-Michele CarellaHematology Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy.
Andrew WeiThe Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Donna HoggeVancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Adam R CraigSunesis Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Judith A FoxSunesis Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Renee WardSunesis Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jennifer A SmithSunesis Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gary ActonSunesis Pharmaceuticals, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Cyrus MehtaCytel, Cambridge, MA, USA; Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Robert K StuartMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Hagop M KantarjianUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and effective treatments are urgently needed for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the efficacy and safety of vosaroxin, a first-in-class anticancer quinolone derivative, plus cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia.

methodsThis phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken at 101 international sites. Eligible patients with acute myeloid leukaemia were aged 18 years of age or older and had refractory disease or were in first relapse after one or two cycles of previous induction chemotherapy, including at least one cycle of anthracycline (or anthracenedione) plus cytarabine. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to vosaroxin (90 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 4 in a first cycle; 70 mg/m(2) in subsequent cycles) plus cytarabine (1 g/m(2) intravenously on days 1-5) or placebo plus cytarabine through a central interactive voice system with a permuted block procedure stratified by disease status, age, and geographical location. All participants were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival and the primary safety endpoint was 30-day and 60-day all-cause mortality. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat; safety analyses included all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01191801.

findingsBetween Dec 17, 2010, and Sept 25, 2013, 711 patients were randomly assigned to vosaroxin plus cytarabine (n=356) or placebo plus cytarabine (n=355). At the final analysis, median overall survival was 7·5 months (95% CI 6·4-8·5) in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group and 6·1 months (5·2-7·1) in the placebo plus cytarabine group (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·73-1·02; unstratified log-rank p=0·061; stratified p=0·024). A higher proportion of patients achieved complete remission in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group than in the placebo plus cytarabine group (107 [30%] of 356 patients vs 58 [16%] of 355 patients, p<0·0001). Early mortality was similar between treatment groups (30-day: 28 [8%] of 355 patients in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group vs 23 [7%] of 350 in the placebo plus cytarabine group; 60-day: 70 [20%] vs 68 [19%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred at any time in 20 (6%) of 355 patients given vosaroxin plus cytarabine and in eight (2%) of 350 patients given placebo plus cytarabine. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 116 (33%) and 58 (17%) patients in each group, respectively. Grade 3 or worse adverse events that were more frequent in the vosaroxin plus cytarabine group than in the placebo plus cytarabine group included febrile neutropenia (167 [47%] vs 117 [33%]), neutropenia (66 [19%] vs 49 [14%]), stomatitis (54 [15%] vs 10 [3%]), hypokalaemia (52 [15%] vs 21 [6%]), bacteraemia (43 [12%] vs 16 [5%]), sepsis (42 [12%] vs 18 [5%]), and pneumonia (39 [11%] vs 26 [7%]).

interpretationAlthough there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between groups, the prespecified secondary analysis stratified by randomisation factors suggests that the addition of vosaroxin to cytarabine might be of clinical benefit to some patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia.

fundingSunesis Pharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedNaphthyridinesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRemission InductionCytarabineNaphthyridinesThiazolesvosaroxin

Identifiers

PMID26234174
PMCPMC4822512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.