Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26233599›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2015

Bone Homeostasis and Repair: Forced Into Shape.

Alesha B Castillo, Philipp Leucht

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Molecular mechanisms of exercise contributing to tissue regeneration.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Osteoblast-derived paracrine factors regulate angiogenesis in response to mechanical stimulation.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alesha B CastilloDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University Polytechnic School of Engineering, New York, NY, USA, alesha.castillo@nyu.edu.
Philipp Leucht

Funding

RRD VA I01 RX001500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical loading is a potent anabolic regulator of bone mass, and the first line of defense for bone loss is weight-bearing exercise. Likewise, protected weight bearing is the first prescribed physical therapy following orthopedic reconstructive surgery. In both cases, enhancement of new bone formation is the goal. Our understanding of the physical cues, mechanisms of force sensation, and the subsequent cellular response will help identify novel physical and therapeutic treatments for age- and disuse-related bone loss, delayed- and nonunion fractures, and significant bony defects. This review highlights important new insights into the principles and mechanisms governing mechanical adaptation of the skeleton during homeostasis and repair and ends with a summary of clinical implications stemming from our current understanding of how bone adapts to biophysical force.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBone RegenerationBone RemodelingHomeostasisHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoblastsOsteocytesStress, MechanicalWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.