ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2015
Impact of Appointment-Based Medication Synchronization on Existing Users of Chronic Medications.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative contribution of pharmacists and primary care providers to shared quality measures.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- An exploration of barriers, facilitators, and practical solutions for adopting medication synchronization into community pharmacies: A qualitative analysis.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Barriers and facilitators to medicine collection through the CCMDD programme at a Durban Hospital.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2022Article
- Design and effect of performance-based pharmacy payment models.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Article
- The association of pharmacy fill synchronization with breast cancer endocrine therapy adherence.Cancer · 2019Article
- Pilot and Feasibility of Combining a Medication Adherence Intervention and Group Diabetes Education for Patients with Type-2 Diabetes.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Factors Influencing Prescription Drug Synchronization: The Complex Role of Number of Medications.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019Article
- A Medication Synchronization Program and Blood Pressure Levels in a Community Pharmacy: Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Using Dispensing Data to Evaluate Adherence Implementation Rates in Community Pharmacy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Community Pharmacy Enhanced Dispensing Model to Improve Medication Access for Rural Patients Living with HIV.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019Article
- Impact of Appointment-Based Medication Synchronization on Proportion of Days Covered for Chronic Medications.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- A renewed Medication Adherence Alliance call to action: harnessing momentum to address medication nonadherence in the United States.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Telehealth in community pharmacy: A new "place" for the appointment-based model given COVID-19 and the future of health care.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
- Primary healthcare policy and vision for community pharmacy and pharmacists in the United States.Pharmacy practiceArticle
- Retrospective analysis of drug therapy problems identified with a telephonic appointment-based model of medication synchronization.Pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppointment-based medication synchronization (ABMS) has been associated with greater patient adherence and persistence when patients begin taking chronic medications. It is not known whether similar results will be seen for patients who have been taking chronic medications for 6 months or more.
objectiveTo compare the impact of a community pharmacy chain's ABMS program on medication adherence and persistence of existing users of chronic medications with individuals who are not enrolled in the program.
methodsA retrospective cohort study compared patients receiving ABMS with matched comparison groups receiving usual care. ABMS consisted of synchronizing a patient's medications to be dispensed on a single appointment day every month, a call to the patient prior to the appointment day to address any prescription changes and to remind the patient, and a patient visit to the pharmacy to pick up the medications. Outcomes were 1-year adherence rates using proportion of days covered (PDC) and 1-year nonpersistence rates. Data for this study came from prescription claims records of patients taking 1 of 6 chronic medication classes during the period of December 1, 2011, to February 28, 2014. ABMS patients were matched with comparison groups according to prior adherence behavior, medication class, age, gender, and geographic region.
resultsMean PDC scores ranged from 0.73 to 0.91 for ABMS patients (n = 205 to 716) and from 0.57 to 0.71 for usual care depending on the medication class. The percentage of adherent individuals (i.e., PDC ≥ 0.80) was 55% to 84% for ABMS participants and 37% to 62% for usual care. Odds of adherence was 2.3 to 3.6 times greater with ABMS. Usual care patients became nonpersistent (61% to 74%) more often than ABMS patients (33% to 44%) with hazard ratios of nonpersistence being 0.39 to 0.67 for individuals in the program.
conclusionsAn ABMS program in a community pharmacy setting was associated with higher rates of adherence and persistence for patients who had been taking chronic medications for at least 6 months. Approximately 18 to 35 additional ABMS participants were adherent for every 100 patients enrolled when compared with usual care. For every 100 patients receiving usual care, 17 to 40 additional patients in the ABMS group were persistent. This study shows that ABMS programs can improve medication adherence and persistence for patients who are newly prescribed or currently taking chronic medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.