ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2015
Molecular Allergy Diagnostics: Analytical Features That Support Clinical Decisions.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dendritic cell-specific deletion of PKCδ in offspring of allergic mothers prevents the predisposition for development of allergic lung inflammation in offspring.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2024Article
- One Year in the Extreme Isolation of Antarctica-Is This Enough to Modulate an "Allergic" Sensitization?Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Peanut components measured by ISAC: comparison with ImmunoCap and clinical relevance in peanut allergic children.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2021Article
- Characterization of Relevant Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Food Allergies: An Overview of the 2S Albumin Family.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A WAO - ARIA - GAThe World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- Precision medicine allergy immunoassay methods for assessing immunoglobulin E sensitization to aeroallergen molecules.World journal of methodology · 2018Article
- Distinguishing allergens from non-allergenic homologues using Physical-Chemical Property (PCP) motifs.Molecular immunology · 2018Article
- Natural Evolution of IgE Responses to Mite Allergens and Relationship to Progression of Allergic Disease: a Review.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017Review
- Diagnosing allergic sensitizations in the third millennium: why clinicians should know allergen molecule structures.Clinical and translational allergy · 2017Review
- Pollen Allergens for Molecular Diagnosis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016Review
- Coping with cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants in allergy diagnosis.Allergo journal internationalReview
- Using Component-Resolved Diagnostics in the Management of Peanut-Allergic Patients.Current treatment options in allergyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of purified native and recombinant allergenic molecules into IgE antibody assays can improve analytical sensitivity and specificity for selected allergen specificities. They enhance analytical sensitivity by allowing assays to detect IgE antibodies with a lower limit of quantification (LoQ) to missing or poorly represented allergens in diagnostic extracts that are commonly used in vivo and in vitro. Use of selected allergenic molecules can help improve the clinician's prediction of the risk of a serious allergic reaction to stable allergens. They can provide diagnostic information to determine if a provocation challenge (e.g., oral food challenge) is indeed mandatory or not necessarily needed to support the final diagnostic decision. Suspected cross-reactivity based on the clinical history can be adjudicated by analyzing IgE antibodies to allergenic molecules from cross-reactive protein families. Finally, genuine primary sensitization can be identified by IgE antibody responses that are measured to selected allergenic molecules which are present in only one particular allergen source. After allergen-specific IgE detection, careful interpretation is required by the physician who knows the patient's history. Applying single allergen molecules, positive IgE antibody results are still only relevant in the case of corresponding objective symptoms. Subsequently, clinical relevance of such an IgE antibody test result must be determined by the clinician and not by the test itself. Because of their comprehensive nature, allergen extracts will remain the principal allergen source for diagnostic in vivo and in vitro assays of IgE antibody for many years. Judicious use of individual allergenic molecules in serum IgE assays may provide their most cost effective and efficient application for establishing a definitive diagnosis of human allergic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.