Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26232907›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Screening for Depression in African-American Churches.

Sidney H Hankerson, Young A Lee, David K Brawley, Kenneth Braswell, Priya J Wickramaratne, Myrna M Weissman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04524767 (Community Partnered Participatory Approach to Implement Depression Screening in Black Churches), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04524767 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Community Partnered Participatory Approach to Implement Depression Screening in Black Churches

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled505ConditionsDepressionArmsSBIRT, Referral as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sidney H HankersonColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York. Electronic address: hankerss@nyspi.columbia.edu.
Young A LeeDepartment of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
David K BrawleySt. Paul Community Baptist Church, Brooklyn, New York.
Kenneth BraswellFathers Incorporated, Dunwoody, Georgia.
Priya J WickramaratneDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Myrna M WeissmanColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USNew York State Psychiatric InstitutePeople’s Community Baptist Church · US

Funding

Research Training in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: From Animal Models to PatientsT32MH015144 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Eduardo David Leonardo · 1985 to 2026
$11.1M
Community Partnered Approach to Implement EBPs for DepressionK23MH102540 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI HANKERSON, SIDNEY H · 2014 to 2017
$738k
NIMH NIH HHS 1 K23 MH102540-01A1NIMH NIH HHS 5-T32 MH015144NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH102540NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH015144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSubstantial racial/ethnic disparities exist in the identification and management of major depression. Faith-Based Health Promotion interventions reduce disparities in health screenings for numerous medical conditions. However, the feasibility of systematically screening for depression in faith-based settings has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a validated instrument to screen for depression in African-American churches.

methodsParticipants were recruited between October and November 2012 at three predominantly African-American churches in New York City. A participatory research approach was used to determine screening days. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was administered to 122 participants. Positive depression screen was defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥10. Descriptive statistics were used to report sample characteristics, prevalence of participants who screened positive, and history of help seeking. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association of positive depression screen and sociodemographic characteristics. Initial analyses were conducted in 2013, with additional analyses in 2014.

resultsThe prevalence estimate for positive depression screen was 19.7%. More men (22.5%) screened positive than women (17.7%). Total household income was inversely related to positive depression screen. A similar percentage of respondents had previously sought help from primary care providers as from clergy.

conclusionsIt was feasible to screen for depression with the PHQ-9 in African-American churches. The prevalence of positive depression screen was high, especially among black men. Churches may be an important setting in which to identify depressive symptoms in this underserved population.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchDepressionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityProtestantism

Identifiers

PMID26232907
PMCPMC4575828
OpenAlexW1491719870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.