Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26232902›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Patterns of Walkability, Transit, and Recreation Environment for Physical Activity.

Marc A Adams, Michael Todd, Jonathan Kurka, Terry L Conway, Kelli L Cain, Lawrence D Frank, James F Sallis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Urban Form Metrics for Promoting Walking: Street Layouts and Destinations.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc A AdamsExercise Science and Health Promotion, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona. Electronic address: marc.adams@asu.edu.
Michael ToddCollege of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jonathan KurkaExercise Science and Health Promotion, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Terry L ConwayDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California;
Kelli L CainDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California;
Lawrence D FrankSchools of Population and Public Health and Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
James F SallisDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California;

Funding

Ecological Analysis of Physical ActivityR01HL067350 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SALLIS, JAMES F. · 2001 to 2004
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL67350NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL067350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiverse combinations of built environment (BE) features for physical activity (PA) are understudied. This study explored whether patterns of GIS-derived BE features explained objective and self-reported PA, sedentary behavior, and BMI.

methodsNeighborhood Quality of Life Study participants (N=2,199, aged 20-65 years, 48.2% female, 26% ethnic minority) were sampled in 2001-2005 from Seattle / King County WA and Baltimore MD / Washington DC regions. Their addresses were geocoded to compute net residential density, land use mix, retail floor area ratio, intersection density, public transit, and public park and private recreation facility densities using a 1-km network buffer. Latent profile analyses (LPAs) were estimated from these variables. Multilevel regression models compared profiles on accelerometer-measured moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and self-reported PA, adjusting for covariates and clustering. Analyses were conducted in 2013-2014.

resultsSeattle region LPAs yielded four profiles, including low walkability/transit/recreation (L-L-L); mean walkability/transit/recreation (M-M-M); moderately high walkability/transit/recreation (MH-MH-MH); and high walkability/transit/recreation (H-HH). All measures were higher in the HHH than the LLL profile (difference of 17.1 minutes/day for MVPA, 146.5 minutes/week for walking for transportation, 58.2 minutes/week for leisure-time PA, and 2.2 BMI points; all p<0.05). Baltimore region LPAs yielded four profiles, including L-L-L; M-M-M; high land use mix, transit, and recreation (HLU-HT-HRA); and high intersection density, high retail floor area ratio (HID-HRFAR). HLU-HT-HRA and L-L-L differed by 12.3 MVPA minutes/day; HID-HRFAR and L-L-L differed by 157.4 minutes/week for walking for transportation (all p<0.05).

conclusionsPatterns of environmental features explain greater differences in adults' PA than the four-component walkability index.

Indexed as

Environment DesignMotor ActivityRecreationResidence CharacteristicsWalkingActigraphyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTransportationUrban PopulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26232902
PMCPMC4523897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.