Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26232206›Full record

ReviewJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2016

A realist synthesis of the evidence on outreach programmes for health improvement of Traveller Communities.

M Lhussier, S M Carr, N Forster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M LhussierDepartment of Public Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus East (H012), Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK.
S M CarrDepartment of Public Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus East (H012), Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK Faculty of Health, Federation University, Australia.
N ForsterDepartment of Public Health and Wellbeing, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus East (H012), Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, UK Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health 10/3004/02Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving the health of Traveller Communities is an international public health concern but there is little evidence on effective interventions. This study aimed to explain how, for whom and in what circumstances outreach works in Traveller Communities.

methodsA realist synthesis was undertaken. Systematic literature searches were conducted between August and November 2011. Grey literature was sought and key stakeholders were involved throughout the review process. Iterative steps of data extraction, analysis and synthesis, followed by additional searches were undertaken.

resultsAn explanatory framework details how, why and in what circumstances participation, behaviour change or social capital development happened. The trust status of outreach workers is an important context of outreach interventions, in conjunction with their ability to negotiate the intervention focus. The higher the outreach worker's trust status, the lower the imperative that they negotiate the intervention focus. A 'menu' of reasoning mechanisms is presented, leading to key engagement outcomes.

conclusionsAdopting a realist analysis, this study offers a framework with explanatory purchase as to the potential of outreach to improve health in marginalized groups.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsRomani PeopleHealth PromotionHealth StatusHumansProgram Evaluationhealth promotionpopulation-based and preventative servicesrelationships

Identifiers

PMID26232206
PMCPMC4894485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.